L K TRUST,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), BENGALURU
What were the facts?
The assessee, a trust engaged in real estate, entered into a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) to develop land. The Assessing Officer (AO) proposed to consider the builder's cost of construction as the sale consideration for the assessee's share of built-up area, deviating from the assessee's valuation based on stamp duty and judicial precedents.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the AO erred in adopting the builder's cost of construction as the sale consideration. It noted that the assessee's reliance on judicial precedents where the revenue's approach was rejected was relevant, and the AO's attempt to distinguish the cases based on the availability of verifiable data was not sufficiently established.
What were the issues?
Whether the cost of construction incurred by the developer should be considered as the full value of consideration for the landowner's share in a JDA, and whether judicial precedents on similar matters are distinguishable.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153A,Section 50D,Section 50C,Section 133(6),Section 131
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, BANGALORE
Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED & SHRI SOUNDARARAJAN K
PER WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
These cross appeals filed by the assessee and the Revenue are against the order of the ld. CIT(A)–11, Bengaluru vide order dated
ITA No.1147 & 1375/Bang/2025 21/03/2024 in DIN No. ITBA/APL/M/250/2024-25/1074816064(1) for the assessment year 2018-19. First, we take up ITA No. 1147/Bang/2025, an appeal by the assessee.
The assessee has raised as many as 10 grounds of appeal and multiple sub-grounds u
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153A
- Veera Mani Kumari Vattikooti, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward -11(1), HyderabadITA 1218/HYD/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Veera Mani Kumar Vatti Kooti, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward -11(1), HyderabadITA 1069/HYD/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs M/S. Kalindi Ispat Pvt. Ltd., BilaspurITA 80/JAB/2018[2015-16]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs M/S. Kalindi Ispat Pvt. Ltd., BilaspurITSSA 22/JAB/2018[2014-15]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs M/S. Kalindi Ispat Pvt. Ltd., BilaspurITSSA 21/JAB/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. S.G. Fab vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 6 Oct 2026
- Meghnath Kapri vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Meghnath Kapri vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Nithil Agarwal vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Navneet Singh vs. The State Of Jharkhand Through Chief Secretary, Government Of JharkhandJharkhand · 6 Oct 2026