SULTHAN GOLD PVT. LTD.,,MANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, MANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that when a search and seizure action is undertaken, and incriminating material is found, the reassessment must be initiated under Section 153A, not Section 147. The notice under Section 147 and subsequent actions were deemed without jurisdiction.
What were the facts?
The assessee's assessment was reopened under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act based on a search and seizure action. The assessee argued that reassessment should have been initiated under Section 153A, as the reopening was predicated on materials found during the search.
What were the issues?
Whether reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 are valid when the basis for reopening is a search and seizure action, or if Section 153A should have been invoked.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 132,Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 148,Section 153A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES, BANGALORE
Before: SHRI BALAKRISHNAN S & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY
Per Bench :
These appeals are filed by the Assessee against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-2-Panaji vide DIN: ITBA/APL/M/250/2025-26/1075777518(1), ITBA/APL/M/250/2025- 26/1075801324(1) and ITBA/APL/M/250/2025-26/1075777462(1), all Orders dated 24.04.2025 for the Assessment Year 2013-14. Since the assessee belongs to same group, and the grounds raised are similar and identical in all the three appeals, these appeals are clubbed and heard together and a consolidated order is being passed. We will take up appeal in ITA No.1397/Bang/2025 as a lead appeal and the facts are culled out therefrom.
Briefly stated facts of the case are the assessee is a firm and is in the business of retail sale of jewellery. The assessee filed the return of income on 13.11.2013 for the Assessment Year 2013-14 admitting a total income of Rs.1,01,05,990/-. The return was summarily processed under section 143(1) of the Act on 04.05.2014. Subsequently, the case was selected for scrutiny under CASS and the assessment proceedings under section 143(3) of the Act was completed by assessing the total income at Rs.1,11,05,990/- vide Order dated 16.02.2016. Subsequently, a search and seizure action under section 132 of the Act was carried out in the case of M/s. Sultan Gold Group on 26.06.2019, based on the warrant of authorization. Thereafter, the learned AO issued notice under section 148 of the Act to the assessee on 17.03.2021. In response, the assessee filed return of income on 27.03.2021 admitting a total income
ITA Nos.1397, 1425, 1447/Bang/2025 Page 3 of 22 of Rs.1,01,05,990/-. The learned AO completed the assessment on 03.03.2022 under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act by determining the total income at Rs.1,63,55,937/-
On being aggrieved by the Order of the learned AO, assessee carried the matter before the learned CIT(A). Before the learned CIT(A), the assessee raised the ground of appeal challenging the reassessment under section 147 instead of section 153A of the Act. The learned CIT(A) stated that merely quoting wrong section in the Assessment Order cannot render the assessment proceedings void-ab-initio. He further stated that the provisions of section 292BB of the Act cures the defect. Based on the submissions made during the appeal proceedings, the learned CIT(A) granted partial relief to the assessee thereby partly allowing appeal of the assessee.
On being aggrieved by the Order of the learned CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before us by raising the following grounds:
The learned CIT(A) erred in passing the order u/s 143(3) r.w.s.147 of the Act, in the manner he did. 2. The learned CIT(A)ought to have appreciated that the condition precedent being absent the assessment passed u/s 147 is bad in law. 3. The learned CIT(A) is upholding the contention of AO in not justifying the assessed income of the assessee of Rs. 1,63,55,937/- as against income return in 2013-14 under facts and circumstances of the appellants case. 4. The learned CIT(A)ought to have appreciated that the AO has failed to bring any material on record to support the allegations of suppressed of sales, Therefore, the order is liable to be quashed. 5. The learned CIT(A)ought to have appreciated that the learned AO has arrived at G.P. by applying higher GP rate of 6.9% on alleged turnover and not based on seized material. 6. The learned CIT(A)ought to have appreciated that the addition was made without giving an opportunity of Cross-examination, hence proceeding is against violation of principle of natural justice and bad in law.
ITA Nos.1397, 1425, 1447/Bang/2025 Page 4 of 22 7. The learned CIT(A)ought to have appreciated that the information of seized material was not provided even after many requests, hence the addition made to the tune of Rs.22,72,779/- is liable to be deleted. 8. The learned CIT(A) failed to consider that any addition made without issuing of show cause notice and draft of assessment order, hence the entire assessment proceeding is bad in law. 9. The learned CIT(A) erred inConfirming the interest u/s 234B and 234C of the Act, without considering the explanation of the appellant. 10. The Appellant craves leave to add, amend or alter any of the foregoing grounds. 11. For these and any other grounds that may be urged before the Hon'ble ITAT, it is prayed that the Hon'ble ITAT may allow the appeal with cost.
At the outset the learned AR submitted that ground No.2 be adjudicated at first since it goes to the root of the matter challenging the assessment made under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act. He submitted that the search and seizure action on the basis of warrant issued under section 132 of the Act, the reassessment ought to have been initiated under section 153A of the Act based on the incriminating materials seized during search operations for the relevant Assessment Year. He further submitted that the learned AO issued notice under section 148 of the Act, reopened the assessment without resorting to issuing notice under section 153A of the Act. The very foundation of the notice issued under Section 148 of the Act was the search action under Section 132 taken at the premises of the assessee and group associates on 26th June 2019. It is his submission that once the entire basis of reopening was on the search action, what is material to be seen, is not what the assessee would contend, which would be determinative of the very jurisdiction of the Assessing officer, to take recourse to the provisions of Section 148. It is his submission that once the foundation of the impugned notice itself was based on a search action and the alleged material, then necessarily, the only option available to the Revenue was to take recourse to the
ITA Nos.1397, 1425, 1447/Bang/2025 Page 5 of 22 provisions of Section 153A of the Act, which provides for assessment in case of a search or requisition, and not to take recourse to the provisions of Sections 147 and 148 of the Act. The learned AR further submitted that in any case Section 153A would have an overriding effect on the provisions of Section 147 and Section 148, as sub- section (1) of Section 153A clearly implies. It is, therefore, his submission that the impugned action of issuance of a notice under Section 148 of the Act and to proceed under Section 147 was without jurisdiction.
In support of his contention, learned AR has placed reliance on the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Pr. CIT v. Abhisar Buildwell (P.) Ltd [2023] 149 taxmann.com 399/293 Taxman 141/454 ITR 212(SC) 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 346; decision of Division Bench of Rajasthan High Court in Shyam Sunder Khandelwal v. Asstt.CIT [2024] 161 taxmann.com 255 (Raj) Civil Writ Petition No. 18363 of 2019 dated 19.03.2024, decision of Karnataka High Court in Sri Dinakara Suvarna v. Dy.CIT [2022] 143 taxmann.com 362/[2023] 454 ITR 21 (Kar).
Per Contra, the learned DR Shri N. S. Shashidar and Shri S. Pradeep, by way of written submissions made during the hearing contended that the estimated additions are founded upon electronic data recovered during the search, collaborative documentary material and statements of the software developer and employees and the voluntary disclosure made by the managing partner. The learned CIT(A), after calling for the detailed remand report, has already granted substantial relief to the assessee and the additions that survive in the appellate proceedings are based on only the verified
ITA Nos.1397, 1425, 1447/Bang/2025 Page 6 of 22 and reconciled incriminating material. He further stated that search also revealed discrepancies between the physical inventory and the books of accounts at certain business premises of the assessee. He further stated that the reassessment proceedings were on the basis of tangible material disclosing escapement of income. He therefore prayed that the additions sustained by the learned CIT(A) shall be upheld.
We have heard the rival parties and perused the record, including the written submissions of the Revenue and decisions relied on by the parties. At the outset, we may observe that the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer to issue the impugned notice would be required to be considered based on the departmental record and on such basis, the relevant provisions of law which would govern the facts and circumstances of the case in the hands of the Assessing Officer. In the present case, the impugned notice under Section 148 of the Act was issued to the assessee on 17 March, 2021.
Thus, on the perusal of reasons, it is quite clear that the provisions of Section 153A providing for "Assessment in case of search or requisition" and the provisions of Section 153C, which provide for "Assessment of income of any other person", which ordain that recourse be taken to the provisions of Section 153A stand attracted for an assessment to be undertaken.
As the controversy revolves around the applicability of Section 153A and more particularly, as to whether Section 153A read with Section 153C vis-a-vis the
ITA Nos.1397, 1425, 1447/Bang/2025 Page 7 of 22 provisions of Section 147 of the Act, it will be appropriate to extract the said provisions, which reads thus: "147. Income escaping assessment.—If the Assessing Officer has reason to believe that any income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment for any assessment year, he may, subject to the provisions of sections 148 to 153, assess or reassess such income and also any other income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment and which comes to his notice subsequently in the course of the proceedings under this section, or recompute the loss or the depreciation allowance or any other allowance, as the case may be, for the assessment year concerned; Provided that where an assessment under sub-section (3) of section 143 or this section has been made for the relevant assessment year, no action shall be taken under this section after the expiry of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, unless any income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment for such assessment year by reason of the failure on the part of the assessee to make a return under section 139 or in response to a notice issued under sub-section (1) of section 142 or section 148 or to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for his assessment, for that assessment year: Provided further that nothing contained in the first proviso shall apply in a case where any income in relation to any asset (including financial interest in any entity) located outside India, chargeable to tax, has escaped assessment for any assessment year: Provided also that the Assessing Officer may assess or reassess such income, other than the income involving matters which are the subject matters of any appeal, reference or revision, which is chargeable to tax and has escaped assessment. Explanation 1.—Production before the Assessing Officer of account books or other evidence from which material evidence could with due
ITA Nos.1397, 1425, 1447/Bang/2025 Page 8 of 22 diligence have been discovered by the Assessing Officer will not necessarily amount to disclosure within the meaning of the foregoing proviso. Explanation 2.—For the purposes of this section, the following shall also be deemed to be cases where income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment, namely:— (a) where no return of income has been furnished by the assessee although his total income or the total income of any other person in respect of which he is assessable under this Act during the previous year exceeded the maximum amount which is not chargeable to income-tax; (b) where a return of income has been furnished by the assessee but no assessment has been made and it is noticed by the Assessing Officer that the assessee has understated the income or has claimed excessive loss, deduction, allowance or relief in the return; (ba) where the assessee has failed to furnish a report in respect of any international transaction which he was so required under section 92E;] (c) where an assessment has been made, but—(i) income chargeable to tax has been underassessed; or(ii) such income has been assessed at too low a rate; or(iii) such income has been made the subject of excessive relief under this Act ; or(iv) excessive loss or depreciation allowance or any other allowance under this Act has been computed; (ca) where a return of income has not been furnished by the assessee or a return of income has been furnished by him and on the basis of information or document received from the prescribed income-tax authority, under sub-section (2) of section 133C, it is noticed by the Assessing Officer that the income of the assessee exceeds the maximum amount not chargeable to tax, or as the case may be, the assessee has understated the income or has claimed excessive loss, deduction, allowance or relief in the return;(d) where a person is found to have
ITA Nos.1397, 1425, 1447/Bang/2025 Page 9 of 22 any asset (including financial interest in any entity) located outside India. Explanation 3.—For the purpose of assessment or reassessment under this section, the Assessing Officer may assess or reassess the income in respect of any issue, which has escaped assessment, and such issue comes to his notice subsequently in the course of the proceedings under this section, notwithstanding that the reasons for such issue have not been included in the reasons recorded under subsection (2) of section 148.
Explanation 4.—For the removal of doubts, it is hereby clarified that the provisions of this section, as amended by the Finance Act, 2012 (23 of 2012), shall also be applicable for any assessment year beginning on or before the 1st day of April, 2012.
153A. Assessment in case of search or requisition. (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 139, section 147, section 148, section 149, section 151 and section 153, in the case of a person where a search is initiated under section 132 or books of account, other documents or any assets are requisitioned under section 132A after the 31st day of May, 2003 [but on or before the 31st day of March, 2021], the Assessing Officer shall— (a) issue notice to such person requiring him to furnish within such period, as may be specified in the notice, the return of income in respect of each assessment year falling within six assessment years and for the relevant assessment year or years referred to in clause (b), in the prescribed form and verified in the prescribed manner and setting forth such other particulars as may be prescribed and the provisions of this Act shall, so far as may be, apply accordingly as if such return were a return required to be furnished under section 139;
ITA Nos.1397, 1425, 1447/Bang/2025 Page 10 of 22 (b) assess or reassess the total income of six assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which such search is conducted or requisition is made and for the relevant assessment year or years: Provided that the Assessing Officer shall assess or reassess the total income in respect of each assessment year falling within such six assessment years and for the relevant assessment year or years: Provided further that assessment or reassessment, if any, relating to any assessment year falling within the period of six assessment years and for the relevant assessment year or years referred to in this subsection pending on the date of initiation of the search under section 132 or making of requisition under section 132A, as the case may be, shall abate : Provided also that the Central Government may by rules made by it and published in the Official Gazette(except in cases where any assessment or reassessment has abated under the second proviso), specify the class or classes of cases in which the Assessing Officer shall not be required to issue notice for assessing or reassessing the total income for six assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which search is conducted or requisition is made and for the relevant assessment year or years: Provided also that no notice for assessment or reassessment shall be issued by the Assessing Officer for the relevant assessment year or years unless— (a) the Assessing Officer has in his possession books of account or other documents or evidence which reveal that the income, represented in the form of asset, which has escaped assessment amounts to or is likely to amount to fifty lakh rupees or more in the relevant assessment year or in aggregate in the relevant assessment years;
ITA Nos.1397, 1425, 1447/Bang/2025 Page 11 of 22 (b) the income referred to in clause (a) or part thereof has escaped assessment for such year or years; and (c)the search under section 132 is initiated or requisition under section 132A is made on or after the 1st day of April, 2017. Explanation 1.—For the purposes of this sub-section, the expression "relevant assessment year" shall mean an assessment year preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which search is conducted or requisition is made which falls beyond six assessment years but not later than ten assessment years from the end of the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which search is conducted or requisition is made. Explanation 2.—For the purposes of the fourth proviso, "asset" shall include immovable property being land or building or both, shares and securities, loans and advances, deposits in bank account. (2) If any proceeding initiated or any order of assessment or reassessment made under sub-section (1) has been annulled in appeal or any other legal proceeding, then, notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) or section 153, the assessment or reassessment relating to any assessment year which has abated under the second proviso to sub-section (1), shall stand revived with effect from the date of receipt of the order of such annulment by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner: Provided that such revival shall cease to have effect, if such order of annulment is set aside. Explanation.—For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that,(i) save as otherwise provided in this section, section 153B and section 153C, all other provisions of this Act shall apply to the assessment made under this section;(ii) in an assessment or reassessment made in respect of an assessment year under this section, the tax shall be chargeable at the rate or rates as applicable to such assessment year."
ITA Nos.1397, 1425, 1447/Bang/2025 Page 12 of 22 11. On a plain reading of Section 153A, it is clear that it begins with a ' non-obstante' clause, when it provides that notwithstanding anything contained in section 139, section 147, section 148, section 149, section 151 and section 153, in the case of a person where a search is initiated under section 132 or books of account, other documents or any assets are requisitioned under section 132A after 31st May, 2003 but on or before 31 March, 2021, the Assessing Officer shall have jurisdiction to issue notice to such person to furnish the return of income as specified in the notice or assess or reassess the total income as provided by the provision. Section153C also begins with a non-obstante clause, when it provides that notwithstanding anything contained in Section 139, Section 147, Section 148, Section 149, Section 151 and Section 153, to provide that, in a situation which may fall under Section 153C insofar as assessment of income of any other person is concerned, the Assessing Officer shall proceed against such other person and issue notice and assess or reassess the income of other persons in accordance with the provisions of Section 153A, if he is satisfied that the books of account or document or assets seized or requisitioned have a bearing on the determination of the total income of such person for a period as specified in the said provision and after compliance of other provisions as mandated.
On the other hand, Section 147 provides for "Income escaping assessment", can be invoked when any income chargeable to tax, in the case of an assessee, has escaped assessment for any assessment year. In such situation, the Assessing Officer may subject to the provisions of Sections 148 to 153, assess or reassess such income or recompute the loss for such assessment year and for which a prior notice under Section
ITA Nos.1397, 1425, 1447/Bang/2025 Page 13 of 22 148 would be required to be issued. Section 147 does not contemplate an eventuality which Section 153A or Section 153C contemplates, the basis of which is inter alia a search action under Section 132 being resorted as noted hereinabove. Thus, both these provisions are quite compartmentalized although the deeming effect of both the provisions, may be the same. However, the situations in which such provisions operate are required to be invoked are completely different.
The purport and effect of these provisions was considered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Abhisar Buildwell (P) Ltd. (supra), wherein the scope of assessment under Section 153A of the I.T. Act was considered. In this case, the Revenue's contention was to the effect that the Assessing Officer was competent to consider all the materials which were available on record, including the materials found during search so as to make an assessment of the total income. However, the assessee had contended that there were also decisions of the High Courts to the effect that if assessment proceedings were not pending on the date of initiation of the search, the Assessing Officer needs to consider only the incriminating material found during the search, and was precluded from considering any other material derived from any other source. It is in such context, the Supreme Court considering the purport of the provisions of Section 153A of the Act, vis a vis its applicability qua the provisions of Section 147, and the applicability of Section 132, 132A and notably the decision of the Delhi High Court in CIT v. KabulChawla [2015] 61 taxmann.com 412/234 Taxman 300/[2016] 380 ITR 573 (Delhi) inter alia held that the provisions of Section 153A(1)
ITA Nos.1397, 1425, 1447/Bang/2025 Page 14 of 22 need to be mandatorily resorted once a search takes place. The Hon’ble Supreme Court held as under: "7.1 In the case of Kabul Chawla (supra), the Delhi High Court, while considering the very issue and on interpretation of Section 153A of the Act, 1961, has summarised the legal position as under: 38. On a conspectus of Section 153A(1) of the Act, read with the provisos thereto, and in the light of the law explained in the aforementioned decisions, the legal position that emerges is as under: i. Once a search takes place under Section 132 of the Act, notice under Section 153A(1) will have to be mandatorily issued to the person searched requiring him to file returns for six AYs immediately preceding the previous year relevant to the AY in which the search takes place. ii. Assessments and reassessments pending on the date of the search shall abate. The total income for such AYs will have to be computed by the AOs as a fresh exercise. iii. The AO will exercise normal assessment powers in respect of the six years previous to the relevant AY in which the search takes place. The AO has the power to assess and reassess the 'total income' of the aforementioned six years in separate assessment orders for each of the six years. In other words, there will be only one assessment order in respect of each of the six AYs "in which both the disclosed and the undisclosed income would be brought to tax". iv. Although Section 153 A does not say that additions should be strictly made on the basis of evidence found in the course of the search, or other post-search material or information available with the AO which can be related to the evidence found, it does not mean that the assessment "can be arbitrary or made without any
ITA Nos.1397, 1425, 1447/Bang/2025 Page 15 of 22 relevance or nexus with the seized material. Obviously an assessment has to be made under this Section only on the basis of seized material. v. In absence of any incriminating material, the completed assessment can be reiterated and the abated assessment or reassessment can be made. The word 'assess' in Section 153 A is relatable to abated proceedings (i.e., those pending on the date of search) and the word 'reassess' to completed assessment proceedings. vi. Insofar as pending assessments are concerned, the jurisdiction to make the original assessment and the assessment under Section 153A merges into one. Only one assessment shall be made separately for each AY on the basis of the findings of the search and any other material existing or brought on the record of the AO. vii. Completed assessments can be interfered with by the AO while making the assessment under Section 153 A only on the basis of some incriminating material unearthed during the course of search or requisition of documents or undisclosed income or property discovered in the course of search which were not produced or not already disclosed or made known in the course of original assessment."
The Supreme Court held that it was in complete agreement with the view taken by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in Kabul Chawla (supra) and of the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in Pr.CIT v. Saumya Construction (P.) Ltd [2017] 81taxmann.com 292/[2016] 387 ITR 529 (Guj) taking the view that no addition can be made in respect of the completed assessments in absence of any incriminating material.
ITA Nos.1397, 1425, 1447/Bang/2025 Page 16 of 22 15. Insofar as the present proceedings are concerned, the following observations made by the Supreme Court in the context of Section 147 and 148 of the Act need to be noted: "11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of a search under Section 132 or requisition under Section 132A, the AO gets the jurisdiction to assess or reassess the 'total income' in respect of each assessment year falling within six assessment years. However, it is required to be noted that as per the second proviso to Section 153A, the assessment or re-assessment, if any, relating to any assessment year falling within the period of six assessment years pending on the date of initiation of the search under Section 132 or making of requisition under Section 132A, as the case may be, shall abate. As per sub-section (2) of Section 153A, if any proceeding initiated or any order of assessment or reassessment made under sub-section (1) has been annulled in appeal or any other legal proceeding, then, notwithstanding anything contained in sub- section (1) or section 153, the assessment or reassessment relating to any assessment year which has abated under the second proviso to sub- section (1), shall stand revived with effect from the date of receipt of the order of such annulment by the Commissioner. Therefore, the intention of the legislation seems to be that in case of search only the pending assessment/reassessment proceedings shall abate and the AO would assume the jurisdiction to assess or reassess the 'total income' for the entire six years period/block assessment period. The intention does not seem to be to re-open the completed/unabated assessments, unless any incriminating material is found with respect to concerned assessment year falling within last six years preceding the search. Therefore, on true interpretation of Section 153A of the Act, 1961, in case of a search under Section 132 or requisition under Section 132A and during the
ITA Nos.1397, 1425, 1447/Bang/2025 Page 17 of 22 search any incriminating material is found, even in case of unabated/completed assessment, the AO would have the jurisdiction to assess or reassess the 'total income' taking into consideration the incriminating material collected during the search and other material which would include income declared in the returns, if any, furnished by the assessee as well as the undisclosed income. However, in case during the search no incriminating material is found, in case of completed/unabated assessment, the only remedy available to the Revenue would be to initiate the reassessment proceedings under Sections 147/148 of the Act, subject to fulfillment of the conditions mentioned in sections 147/148, as in such a situation, the Revenue cannot be left with no remedy. Therefore, even in case of block assessment under section 153A and in case of unabated/completed assessment and in case no incriminating material is found during the search, the power of the Revenue to have the reassessment under Sections 147/148 of the Act has to be saved, otherwise the Revenue would be left without remedy. 12. If the submission on behalf of the Revenue that in case of search even where no incriminating material is found during the course of search, even in case of unabated/completed assessment, the AO can assess or reassess the income/total income taking into consideration the other material is accepted, in that case, there will be two assessment orders, which shall not be permissible under the law. At the cost of repetition, it is observed that the assessment under Section 153A of the Act is linked with the search and requisition under Sections 132 and 132A of the Act. The object of Section 153A is to bring under tax the undisclosed income which is found during the course of search or pursuant to search or requisition. Therefore, only in a case where the undisclosed income is found on the basis of incriminating material, the AO would
ITA Nos.1397, 1425, 1447/Bang/2025 Page 18 of 22 assume the jurisdiction to assess or reassess the total income for the entire six years block assessment period even in case of completed/unabated assessment. As per the second proviso to Section153A, only pending assessment/reassessment shall stand abated and the AO would assume the jurisdiction with respect to such abated assessments. It does not provide that all completed/unabated assessments shall abate. If the submission on behalf of the Revenue is accepted, in that case, second proviso to section 153A and sub- section (2) of Section 153A would be redundant and/or re- writing the said provisions, which is not permissible under the law."
It is thus clear that in the event any incriminating material is found during the search, the Revenue necessarily would be required to take recourse to the provisions of Section 153A and in the event no incriminating material found during the search, then the power of the Revenue to have the reassessment under Sections 147/148 of the I.T. Act stands saved, failing which, the Revenue would be left without remedy. It is on such observations the conclusions as rendered by the Supreme Court and which are relevant to the case in hand, are required to be noted, which reads thus: "14. In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, it is concluded as under:(i) that in case of search under Section 132 or requisition under Section 132A, the AO assumes the jurisdiction for block assessment under section 153A;(ii) all pending assessments/reassessments shall stand abated;(iii) in case any incriminating material is found/unearthed, even, in case of unabated/completed assessments, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to assess or reassess the 'total income' taking into consideration the incriminating material unearthed during the
ITA Nos.1397, 1425, 1447/Bang/2025 Page 19 of 22 search and the other material available with the AO including the income declared in the returns; and(iv) in case no incriminating material is unearthed during the search, the AO cannot assess or reassess taking into consideration the other material in respect of completed assessments/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabated assessments, no addition can be made by the AO in absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search under Section 132 or requisition under Section 132A of the Act, 1961. However, the completed/unabated assessments can be re-opened by the AO in exercise of powers under Sections 147/148 of the Act, subject to fulfilment of the conditions as envisaged/mentioned under Sections 147/148 of the Act and those powers are saved.
The Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court in Shyam Sunder Khandelwal (supra) also had taken a similar view when the issue which had arisen before the Court was in regard to the notice issued under Section 148 of the Act, the basis of issuance of such notice was the material seized during search. The contention of the assessee was to the effect that in the said circumstances, the proceedings ought to have been initiated under Section 153A of the Act. The Division Bench referring to the decision of Supreme Court in Abhisar Buildwell (P). Ltd.(supra) as also the decision of Karnataka High Court in Sri Dinakara Suvarna (supra) allowed the petitions observing that the department had not set up a case, that for initiating proceedings under Section 148, it had material other than the material seized during the search.
In the case where search or requisition is made, the AO under Section 153A mandatorily is required to issue notices to the assessee for filing of income tax return
ITA Nos.1397, 1425, 1447/Bang/2025 Page 20 of 22 for the relevant preceding years. The AO assumes jurisdiction to assess/reassess 'total income' by passing separate order for each assessment.
Special procedure is prescribed under Section 153A to 153D for assessment in cases of search and requisition. The provisions of Section 153A to 153D have prevalence over the regular provisions for assessment or reassessment under Section 143 & 147/148.
Section 153A and 153C starts with non-obstante clause. The procedure for assessment/reassessment in Section 153A, 153C in cases of search or requisition has an overriding effect to the regular provisions for assessment or reassessment under Sections 139, 147, 148, 149, 151 & 153 of the Act.
Respectfully following the principles of law as discussed hereinabove, we are of the clear opinion that the foundation of the present case was certainly a search action which was undertaken by the Revenue against Sultan Group and in such search and seizure action, materials were seized and such materials were further explored and enquired. Such enquiry revealed significant information in regard to unaccounted sales. We do not find that the record would indicate something which is not on the basis of such new materials gathered under the search and seizure action under Section 132. Section 153A would be applicable, as held by the Supreme Court in Abhisar Buildwell (P) Ltd. (supra) when the Court interpreted the effect and purport of Section
ITA Nos.1397, 1425, 1447/Bang/2025 Page 21 of 22 153C and 153A, as also held by the Rajasthan High Court in Shyam Sunder Khandelwal.
Therefore, in our opinion that the impugned notice under Section 147 of the Act and all actions consequent thereto are required to be held to be without jurisdiction and bad in law. We therefore set aside the order of the learned CIT(A) and allow ground No 2 raised by the assessee. Since ground No 2 is adjudicated in favour of the assessee by setting aside the assessment, adjudication of the other grounds of appeals are academic and hence left open.
Considering the identicalness of the issues involved in all these appeals, our decision rendered while adjudicating the appeal in ITA No. 1397/Bang/2025 (supra) applies mutatis mutandis to the assessee’s appeals in ITA Nos. 1425, 1447/Bang/2025 also.
In the result the appeals of the assessee are allowed. Pronounced in the open court on the date mentioned on the caption page.
Sd/- Sd/- KESHAV DUBEY BALAKRISHNAN S JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Bangalore Dated: 25.08.2025 /NS*/
ITA Nos.1397, 1425, 1447/Bang/2025 Page 22 of 22 Copy to: 1. Appellants 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR 6. Guard file By order
Assistant Registrar, ITAT, Bangalore.
More judgments on Section 132
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Naresh Chandra Khattar, Agra vs ITO Ward-1(1)(2), AgraITA 475/AGR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026