BANI A K DHILLON,SHAMGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1, KARNAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the lower authorities did not clarify whether the gifted land was a capital asset. Therefore, the appeal was restored to the CIT(A)/NFAC for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee received land as a gift without consideration. The stamp value of the land was Rs. 50.50 lakhs, which was added to her income under Section 56(2)(viib). The assessee claimed the donor was a relative but failed to prove it due to communication gaps.
What were the issues?
Whether the gifted land qualifies as a capital asset for the purpose of Section 56(2)(viib) and if the donor falls under the exempt category of relatives.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘C’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA
PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM
This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2011-12, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1083522082(1), dated 10.12.2025 involving proceedings under section 147 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).
ITA No.248/Del/2026 Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
It transpires during the course of hearing that the assessee’s solitary substantive issue raised herein is directed against both the learned lower authorities’ respective assessment findings dated 05.12.2018, making section 56(2)(viib) addition of Rs. 52,38,125/- in her hands which stands upheld in the lower appellate discussion.
That being the case, learned counsel has filed before us a copy of the relevant gift deed executed by Smt. Sukhsanjam Kaur /donor in her name on 16.03.2011 out of bequeathing the land in question situated in the revenue estate of village Shamgarh Tehsil Nilokheri, Karnal in her favour without any consideration. The said land admittedly had stamp value of Rs. 50.50 lakhs which forms subject matter of addition for our apt adjudication. Learned counsel’s case is that it was on account of various communication gaps that the assessee could not pleaded and prove here aforesaid donor as falling in the exempt category of relatives u/s 56(2) of the Act. There is further no denial to the fact that both the learned lower authorities’ respective findings have nowhere made it clear as to whether the land bequeathed in the assessee’s favour forms 2 | P a g e
ITA No.248/Del/2026 a capital asset or not u/s 56(2)(viib) r.w.s Explanation-(d) thereto or not.
Faced with this situation, we deem it appropriate to restore the assessee’s instant appeal back to CIT(A)/NFAC for his fresh adjudication as per law preferably within three effective opportunities; at her risk and responsibility, in foregoing terms. All other remaining legal as well as factual issues are kept open at this stage.
This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 23rd April, 2026.
Sd/- Sd/- (NAVEEN CHANDRA) (SATBEER SINGH GODARA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 12.05.2026 Pooja Mittal/- Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asst. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi
3 | P a g e
More judgments on Section 56(2)(viib)
- M/S Namdev Finvest Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-1, JaipurITA 1255/JPR/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Payswiff Technologies Private Limited… vs DCIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 131/HYD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Radison Estates Private Limited, Bangalore vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle…ITA 519/BANG/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Income Tax Officer - 9(2)(1), Mumbai vs Coolberg Beverages Pvt Ltd, MumbaiITA 4286/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Medwell Ventures Private Limited, Delhi vs The Dy. CIT, Circle-2(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 1775/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed18 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026