M/S. CYIENT INSIGHTS PRIVATE LIMITED ( FORMELY KNOW AS M/S. CITEC ENINGEERING INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED),HYDERABAD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE 1(1), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 890/MUM/2026Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 April 2026AY 2017-20186 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that expenses incurred on CSR activity by way of donation to eligible charitable organizations are eligible for deduction under Section 80G. Therefore, the rectification order disallowing the deduction was not justified.

What were the facts?

The assessee claimed a deduction of INR 9,30,000 under Section 80G for donations made as part of CSR expenses. The Assessing Officer disallowed this deduction, considering it a mistake apparent from the record under Section 154. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance.

What were the issues?

Whether donations made as part of CSR expenses are eligible for deduction under Section 80G, and if a Section 154 rectification is valid for such a disallowance.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80G,Section 154,Section 143(3),Section 37(1),Section 135(5)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, MUMBAI

[ Per Rahul Chaudhary, Judicial Member:

1.

The present appeal preferred by the Assessee is directed against the Order, dated 26/11/2025, passed by the Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – 2, Chennai [hereinafter referred to as the ‘CIT(A)’] whereby Learned CIT(A) had dismissed the appeal against the Rectification Order, dated 15/03/2023, passed under Section 154 read with Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’], for the Assessment Year 2017-2018. 2. The Assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:

“1. 1. The impugned order of the learned Assessing Officer in so far as it is against the appellant is opposed to law, weight of evidence, natural justice, probabilities, facts and circumstances of the Assessment Year 2017-2018

Appellant’s case.

2.

The learned Commissioner of Income-Tax ought to have given opportunity adhering the principles of natural justice and pass the order on merits rather dismissing the appeal on technical issue, under the facts and circumstances of the case.

3.

Whether the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) – NFAC, is justified in not passing an order under section 250 of the Act, beyond 15 days from last hearing notice, under the facts and circumstances of the case.

4.

The Appellant denies himself liable to be assessed on a total income of Rs. 5,31,83,439/-, as against the income returned an amount being Rs. 5,22,53,440, under the facts and circumstances of the case.

5.

Whether the learned Authorities below are justified in disallowing the donations under section 80G of the Act, paid by the Appellant of an amount being Rs. 9,30,000/-, under the facts and circumstances of the case.

6.

Whether the learned Authorities below are justified contending that there is double disallowance of the same expenditure without considering the fact that sum spent on CSR activity in the form of donation is disallowed under section 37(1) of the Act and further the eligible donation is allowed under section 80G of the Act., under the facts and circumstances of the case.

7.

Whether the learned Authorities below are justified disregarding the law and fact that only donation/contribution made to the Swachh Bharat Kosh and Clean Ganga Fund are not eligible for deduction under section 80G if those contributions are made in pursuance to CSR under section 135(5) of the Companies Act, 2013. Any other donation made to eligible entity is eligible for deduction under section 80G of the Act even if the same forms part of CSR expense of the Appellant, under the facts and circumstances of the case.

8.

The order passed under section 154 of the Act by the learned Authorities below is bad, illegal and without jurisdiction as the allow ability of donation under section 80G of the Act is matter of legal interpretation and cannot be termed as mistake apparent from record, under the facts and circumstances of the case.”

3.

The relevant facts in brief are that the Assessee is a company engaged in the business of providing Information Technology Enabled Services. For the Assessment Year 2017-2018, the Assessee filed its original return of income on 16/11/2017 declaring total income of INR.5,22,53,440/-. The case was selected for scrutiny assessment and Assessment Order, dated 11/03/2021, was passed under Section 2 Assessment Year 2017-2018

143(3) of the Act without any additions/disallowance. Thereafter, Order under section 154 read with Section 143(3) of the Act was passed on 15/03/2023 disallowing deduction of INR.9,30,000/- claimed by the Assessee under Section 80G of the Act on the ground that the payments in respect of which deduction was claimed by the Assessee were in the nature of CSR expenses.

4.

Being aggrieved, the Assessee carried the issue in appeal before Learned CIT(A). Vide Order, dated 26/11/2025, the Learned CIT(A) dismissed the appeal preferred by the Assessee concurring with the reasoning given by the Assessing Officer.

5.

Now the Assessee has preferred the present appeal before the Tribunal challenging the denial of deduction of INR.9,30,000/- claimed by the Assessee under Section 80G of the Act in respect of CSR expenses.

6.

We have given thoughtful consideration to do the rival submissions.

7.

The issue that arises for consideration is whether the expenses incurred on CSR activity by way of donation made to charitable organizations would be eligible for deduction under Section 80G of the Act.

8.

In the present case the Assessee had claimed deduction under Section 80G of the Act in respect of payment of (a) INR.4,30,000/- to Prime Minister Relief Fund (at the rate of 100%) and (b) INR.10,00,000/- towards Jan Vikas Society towards promoting children education (at the rate of 50%). Thus, deduction of INR.9,30,000/- was claimed by the Assessee under Section 80G of the Act in respect of donation of INR.14,30,000/-.

9.

During the course of hearing the Learned Authorized Representative for the Assessee had placed reliance upon following decisions of the Co- ordinate Benches of the Tribunal cited before the Learned CIT(A) and stated in the statement of fact accompanying Form 35: - JMS Mining (P.) Ltd. v. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax,

3 Assessment Year 2017-2018

Kolkata-2 (2021) 130 taxmann.com 118 (Kolkata - Trib.)

- Goldman Sachs Services Pvt Ltd v JCIT [IT(TP) A No. 2355/Bang/2019

- M/s. FNF India Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT (ITA No.1565/Bang/2019),

- National Seeds Corpn. Ltd. v. Addl. CIT [IT Appeal No. 6794 (Delhi) of 2014]

On perusal of above decisions of the Tribunal, we find that the Tribunal had accepted the contentions of the Assessee and has allowed deduction for CSR expenses incurred by way of donation to charitable institutions under Section 80G of the Act.

10.

We find identical view has been taken by the Mumbai Bench of the Tribunal in the case of M/s. Sonata Information Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals): [ITA No.1402/Mum/2024, dated 05/11/2024]. In the aforesaid decision the Tribunal rejected the reasoning given by the Revenue for rejecting Assessee’s claim for deduction under Section 80G of the Act which was identical to the reasoning given by the Assessing Officer in the present case. After taking into consideration the provisions related to CSR contained in Section 135(5) of the Companies Act, 2013, relevant circulars issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affair and provisions contained in Explanation 2 to Section 37(1) of the Act [introduced vide Finance Act, 2014], the Co-Ordinate Bench of the Tribunal had held that the Assessee would be entitled to claim deduction under Section 80G of the Act in respect of CSR expenditure.

11.

There is nothing on record to persuade us to take a different view either on facts or in law. Therefore, adopting the view taken by the Co- ordinate Benches of the Tribunal in favour of the Assessee, we hold that the Assessee was entitled to claim deduction of INR.9,30,000/- under Section 80G of the Act in respect of CSR Expenditure. Therefore, there was no mistake apparent on record in the Assessment Order, dated 11/03/2021, passed under Section 143(3) of the Act warranting

4 Assessment Year 2017-2018

exercise of powers under Section 154 of the Act. Therefore, Ground No.5, 6 & 8 raised by the Assessee are allowed and other grounds raised by the Assessee are dismissed as having been rendered academic in nature.

12.

In result, in terms of paragraph 11 above, the present appeal preferred by the Assessee is allowed.

Order pronounced on 28.04.2026. (Vikram Singh Yadav) Judicial Member मुंबई Mumbai; िदनांक Dated : 28.04.2026

5 Assessment Year 2017-2018 आदेश की "ितिलिप अ"ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ" / The Appellant

1.

""थ" / The Respondent. 2. आयकर आयु"/ The CIT

3.

"धान आयकर आयु" / Pr.CIT 4. िवभागीय "ितिनिध ,आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ,मुंबई / DR, ITAT,

5.

Mumbai गाड" फाईल / Guard file. 6. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, स"ािपत "ित //// उप/सहायक पंजीकार /(Dy./Asstt.

More judgments on Section 80G

All 6,482 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80G →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →