BASANT KUMAR GUPTA,DISTRICT SUPAUL, BIHAR vs. ITO WARD 3(4), SAHARSA, SAHARSA BIHAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay of 166 days in filing the first appeal before the CIT(A). Since the assessment order was passed under Section 144, the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for a de-novo assessment.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A) with a delay of 166 days, citing health issues. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal on delay and also decided the merits, which the assessee contested.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) was sufficiently explained and whether the CIT(A) erred in deciding the appeal on merits without condoning the delay.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PATNA BENCH
Before: SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. & SHRI RAKESH MISHRA
PER YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This Appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of the NFAC, Delhi [“the Ld. CIT(A)”, for short], dated 23.03.2026passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”, for short) for the Assessment Year 2020-21. 2. Brief facts of the case are that, an Assessment Order came to be passed u/s 147 r.w.s144 of the Act on 09.01.2025 by making certain additions. Aggrieved by the Assessment Order dated 09.01.2025, Assessee preferred an Appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) vide order dated 23.03.2026, dismissed the Appeal filed by the Assessee. Basant Kumar Gupta; A.Y: 2020-21 As against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) dated 23.03.2026, Assessee filed the p
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026