GOBINDA CONSTRUCTION,PATNA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, PATNA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s findings on certain business expenses, upholding the AO's order. For an issue regarding unaccounted cash receipt versus expenditure, the Tribunal remitted the matter back to the AO for determination of the true nature of the transaction.
What were the facts?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal heard appeals from both the assessee and the revenue concerning additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) for unexplained business expenditure and sundry creditors. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) had partly deleted some of these additions.
What were the issues?
The primary issues involved the genuineness of business expenditures, the treatment of unpaid sundry creditors, and the classification of an alleged unaccounted cash receipt versus an expenditure.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PATNA BENCH, PATNA (VIRTUAL HEARING AT KOLKATA) SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2019-20
Gobinda Construction, Vs. DCIT, Central Circle-1, Tarag Press Road, Shivpuri, Patna, Near Boring Road, Patna – Income Tax Bhawan, 6th 800023 - Floor, Bir Chand Patel [PAN: AAGFG1782M] Path, Patna - 800001 APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessment Year : 2019-20 - Birchand Patel Marg, Patna - 800023 800001 [PAN: AAGFG1782M]
APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessment Year : 2020-21
Gobinda Construction, Vs. DCIT, Central Circle-1, Tarag Press Road, Shivpuri, Patna, Near Boring Road, Patna – 800023 -
2 ITA No. 382-386/PAT/2025 ITA No. 452-456/PAT/2025 Gobinda Construction [PAN: AAGFG1782M] Income Tax Bhawan, 6th Floor, Bir Chand Patel Path, Patna - 800001 APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessment Year : 2020-21 - Birchand Patel Marg, Patna - 800023 800001 [PAN: AAGFG1782M] Assessment Year
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 41(1)
- ACIT, Central Circle, Agra vs M/S Ghanaram Infraengineers Pvt. Ltd., New…ITA 328/AGR/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT, Central Circle, Agra vs M/S Ghanaram Infraengineers Pvt. Ltd., New…ITA 327/AGR/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- ACIT, Central Circle, Agra vs M/S Ghanaram Infraengineers Pvt. Ltd., New…ITA 326/AGR/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- ACIT-Central Circle, Agra vs M/S Ghanaram Infraengineers Pvt. Ltd., New…ITA 325/AGR/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Morlidhar B Vamdote, Bardoli vs ITO, Ward-1, BardoliITA 1174/SRT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026