SPREADING SMILES,GURGAON vs. ITO-WARD EXEMPTION-FARIDABAD, FARIDABAD
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust, claimed exemption under Section 11. Its application for registration was initially rejected, but later restored by the ITAT. The Assessing Officer denied exemption and disallowed certain expenses, treating the assessee as an AOP. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's order, stating the registration was granted after the assessment year.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the doctrine of relating back applies, and the assessee is eligible for exemption under Section 11 and 12 as the final registration was granted for the original application. Capital expenditure incurred for infrastructure was also considered an application of income and allowable.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is eligible for exemption under Section 11 and 12 when registration is granted retrospectively. Whether capital expenditure on infrastructure is allowable as an application of income for charitable trusts.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 11,Section 12,Section 12A,Section 12AB,Section 143(3),Section 144B,Section 156,Section 164(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR
PER RAMIT KOCHAR, AM: This appeal in ITA No. 2314/Del/2026 for Assessment Year: 2022-23 has arisen form the learned CIT(A)’s appellate order dated 23.02.2026 passed u/s 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961(In Short “the Act”) in DIN & Order No: ITBA/NFAC/S/250/ 2025-26/1086404620(1), which appeal in turn has arisen from the assessment order dated 13.02.2024 passed by the AO u/s 143(3) r.w.s 144B of the 1961 Act .
Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed its return of income u/s 139 for the impugned assessment year on 25.09.2022 , declaring income of Rs. NIL after claiming exemption. The case of the assessee was selected for framing complete scrutiny assessment , and the AO issued
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 11
- Shree Harikrushna Velfare Trust, Bhachau vs The ITO Exemption Ward 1, Rjakot, RajkotITA 677/RJT/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Anantaru Foundation, Mumbai vs CIT (Exemptions), MumbaiITA 8697/MUM/2026[NA]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026
- Anantaru Foundation, Mumbai vs CIT (Exemptions), MumbaiITA 8696/MUM/2026[NA]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026
- M/S. Development Education & Welfare Trust… vs I.T.O., Ward - 2(3), AlipurduarITA 2367/KOL/2026[2020-2021]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2020-2021
- M/S. Development Education & Welfare Trust… vs I.T.O., Ward - 2(3), AlipurduarITA 2366/KOL/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sri Kamatchi Agencies vs. The Deputy Commissioner (Appeal)Madras · 6 Oct 2026
- Dr S.Surya Prakash vs. The Secretary TO GovernmentMadras · 6 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax Midnapore Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Sanmargg Agrotrade INDIA Private Limtied And Anr. vs. Superintendent Central Tax Group-36 Circle-08 Office Of The Commissioner Of Central Tax And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Ramkrishna Datta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026