KARUNESH BHALLA,GURGAON, HARYANA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(1), GURGAON

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1201/DEL/2026Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 May 2026AY 2020-213 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal acknowledged the possibility of communication gaps with the new virtual hearing mechanism. It deemed it appropriate in the interest of justice to restore the appeal to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal for AY 2020-21 was against an order passed under section 154 of the Income-tax Act. The assessee claimed that due to communication gaps, they could not present all relevant facts before the lower appellate authority.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee was prevented from presenting their case effectively before the lower appellate authority due to communication gaps, warranting a remand.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 154

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘G’ NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA

Hearing: 13.05.2026Pronounced: 13.05.2026

PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2020-21, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/Addl./JCIT(A), Mysore’s order dated 08.12.2025, having DIN and order no. ITBA/APL/S/250/2025-26/1083397468(1), involving proceedings under section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).

ITA No.1201/Del/2026

Heard both the parties. Case file perused. 2. Learned counsel submits that on account of communication gaps at various levels, the assessee could not appear to plead and prove all the relevant facts in the lower appellate proceedings; and; therefore, the matter may be restored back to the CIT(A). The Revenue vehemently supports the learned lower authority’s action making the addition(s) herein on merits. 3. Be that as it may, the fact remains that possibility of some communication gaps at various levels in such an instance of the newly introduced virtual hearing mechanism could not be altogether ruled out. It is therefore deemed appropriate in the larger interest of justice to restore the assessee’s instant appeal back to the CIT(A) for his afresh appropriate adjudication, within three effective opportunities of hearing at the appellant’s risk and responsibility, in consequential proceedings. Ordered accordingly. 4. This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.

2 | P a g e

ITA No.1201/Del/2026

Order pronounced in the open court on 13th May, 2026 Sd/- Sd/- (NAVEEN CHANDRA) (SATBEER SINGH GODARA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 14th May, 2026. RK/- Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asst. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi

3 | P a g e

More judgments on Section 154

All 8,676 judgments and leading authorities on Section 154 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →