OM PRAKASH SINGH,MORADABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, MORADABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 7153/DEL/2025Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 May 2026AY 2016-174 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored the matter to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment. This was done in the interest of justice to provide the assessee with a reasonable opportunity to present their case.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a farmer, claims no notice was served during assessment proceedings. He sold agricultural land and used the proceeds to buy more land, believing the sale was non-taxable. The Assessing Officer made a best judgment assessment due to non-response, and the CIT(A) also passed an ex-parte order.

What were the issues?

Whether the ex-parte assessment and appellate orders were valid without proper service of notices and opportunity to the assessee. Whether the sale of agricultural land was taxable.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 148,Section 142(1),Section 144,Section 147,Section 144B

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES, NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY & SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH

PER VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal by the assessee is directed against an ex-parte order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (hereinafter referred to as ‘the CIT(A)’) dated 11.03.2025 for AY 2016-17.

2.

Shri K. Sampath, appearing on behalf of the assessee submits that the assessee is a farmer. No notice of assessment proceedings u/s 148 of the Income

ITA 7153/DEL/2025 OM PRAKASH SINGH Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) or thereafter notice u/s 142(1) of the Act was ever served on the assessee. Therefore, the assessee could not participate in the assessment proceedings. During the period relevant to the assessment year under appeal, the assessee had sold agricultural land and had utilized sales consideration for purchase of another piece of agricultural land. The agricultural land sold by the assessee was beyond 8 KM from the nearest municipal limits. Therefore, the amount received by the assessee on sale of land was not taxable. The Assessing Officer (AO), in the absence of any reply from the assessee, made Best Judgment assessment invoking the provisions of section 144 of the Act and made addition of Rs.85,34,000/-. Thereafter, the assessee filed appeal against the assessment order dated 02.11.2023 passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 r.w.s. 144B of the Act before the CIT(A). The assessee was to be represented before the First Appellate Authority by an Authorized Representative pro bono. No submissions were made on behalf of the assessee. The assessee was under the bona fide impression that he was being duly represented before the First Appellate Authority. Later on, upon receipt of the impugned order, it transpired that no submissions were made on behalf of the assessee. In fact, there was no response to any of the notices issued by the CIT(A). The ld. Counsel prayed for an opportunity to explain the case of the assessee before the authorities below.

3.

Shri Manoj Kumar, representing the Department vehemently defending the impugned order submitted that the assessee is recalcitrant. The assessee neither responded to the notices issued by the AO nor before the CIT(A). He thus prayed for dismissing the appeal of assessee.

4.

Both sides heard, orders of the authorities below examined. A perusal of the impugned order shows that the same is ex parte and even the assessment order has been passed u/s 144 of the Act in the absence of any response from the assessee. Considering the submissions made by the ld. Counsel for the assessee

ITA 7153/DEL/2025 OM PRAKASH SINGH and in the interest of justice, without commenting on merits, we deem it appropriate to restore this matter back to the AO for de novo assessment after affording reasonable opportunity of making submissions to the assessee, in accordance with law.

5.

The AO shall issue notice to the assessee on the email address provided in Form No. 36 i.e. aks.taxation@gmail.com in addition to the email address available in records of the Department.

6.

The assessee upon service of notice(s) shall respond to the same, without fail.

7.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.

Order pronounced in the open court on Thursday the 26th day of February, 2026. Sd/- Sd/- BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH VIKAS AWASTHY ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Delhi Dated: 13-05-2026 Copy to: OM PRAKASH SINGH, EH-94, DEEN DAYAL NAGAR,SAI MANDIR 1 ROAD, MORADABAD, MORADABAD-244001, UTTAR PRADESH 2 ACIT, CIRCLE-1, -, MORADABAD-, UTTAR PRADESH 3 THE PCIT / CIT, 4 THE D.R., ITAT, DELHI BENCH 5 GUARD FILE

ITA 7153/DEL/2025 OM PRAKASH SINGH

More judgments on Section 148

All 35,022 judgments and leading authorities on Section 148 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →