MAHA MAI DEVELOPERS & CO.,,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 3(1),, KOLKATA
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition to the assessee's income based on the difference between the stamp duty value and the consideration paid for a property, without waiting for the Valuation Officer's report. The CIT(A) upheld this addition. The assessee raised an additional ground before the ITAT, arguing that the assessment was unsustainable due to the AO's failure to await the DVO's report and provide an opportunity to be heard.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessment order was not sustainable as it was passed without awaiting the mandatory Valuation Officer's report, violating Section 50C(2) and principles of natural justice. The subsequent rectification order was also deemed invalid. The Tribunal quashed the assessment order.
What were the issues?
Whether an assessment order passed without awaiting the mandatory Valuation Officer's report is sustainable in law, and whether the assessee was denied a fair opportunity to present their case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 50C(2),Section 143(3),Section 155(15),Section 153,Section 142A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, KOLKATA
Per Rajesh Kumar, AM:
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 09.12.2025 for the AY 2018-19. 2. At the time of airing, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has raised additional ground which is extracted below:-
“1) The Appellant/Petitioner filed the aforesaid appeal on 13th February 2026 before the Hon'ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) NFAC passed on 09th December 2025 u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the MAHA MAI DEVELOPERS & CO.; A.Y. 2018-19 Assessment Year 2018-19. The relevant Assessment Order was passed on
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 50C(2)
- Vishnuram Joshi, Shivpuri vs Income Tax Officer Ashok Nagar, Ashok NagarITA 604/AGR/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Vishnuram Joshi, Shivpuri vs Income Tax Officer Ashok Nagar, Ashok NagarITA 604/AGR/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Sudhir Rawat, Jabalpur vs Income Tax Officer Ward-1(3), JabalpurITA 250/JAB/2025[2011-12]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2011-12
- Sudhir Rawat, Jabalpur vs Income Tax Officer Ward-1(3), JabalpurITA 250/JAB/2025[2011-12]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2011-12
- Kashmira Rajnikant Doshi, Mumbai vs Income Tax Officer Ward 42(1)(3), MumbaiITA 728/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rajlaxmi Agro Food Product Private Limited And Anr. vs. The Superint., CGST And Cx, Berhampore Range, Berhampore Division, Bolpur Commiss. And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Shibsankar Ghosh vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Shankar Prasad Gupta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Alkem Laboratories Limited vs. Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise, RaigadBombay · 6 Oct 2026
- Axis Bank LTD vs. State Of Maharashtra Thru. G P And AnrBombay · 6 Oct 2026