AMPHENOL FCI ASIA PTE LTD,SINGAPORE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE INT TAX 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI
What were the facts?
The assessee, a foreign company, earned royalty and management fees from its Indian associate. It claimed royalty on export sales and management fees as exempt, while the revenue sought to tax them. An additional issue for AY 2022-23 concerned the taxability of reimbursed expenses.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the issue of royalty on export sales requires further factual determination by the Assessing Officer regarding the situs of contract execution and where such income is taxed. The issue of management fees was decided in favor of the assessee based on a prior ruling. The direction regarding reimbursement of expenses was held to be beyond the DRP's power.
What were the issues?
Whether royalty income from export sales is taxable in India, and whether management fees are taxable under the India-Singapore DTAA. Additionally, the validity of directions regarding reimbursement of expenses by the DRP.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (4 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
ITA Nos. 1851, 1852, 814, 3002 & 2056 /Del/2022 AMPHENOL FCI ASIA PVT. LTD. IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “D” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI YOGESH KUMAR US, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2018-19 159, Kampong Ampat, #04-01/04 KA Civic Centre, Minto Road, Place, Singapore 368328. New Delhi, PAN No. AABCF5252B Delhi 110002. Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2019-20 159, Kampong Ampat, #04-01/04 KA Civic Centre, Minto Road, Place, Singapore 368328. New Delhi, PAN No. AABCF5252B Delhi 110002. Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2020-21 159, Kampong Ampat, #04-01/04 KA Civic Centre, Minto Road, Place, Singapore 368328. New Delhi, PAN No. AABCF5252B Delhi 110002. Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2021-22 AMPHENOL FCI ASIA PTE. LTD
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 9(1)(vi)
- Ahaguru Education Technology Private… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1993/CHNY/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- Slack Technologies Limited, Mumbai vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 979/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Slack Technologies Limited, Mumbai vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4310/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Atos Information Technology (Singapore) Pte… vs DCIT, (Internation Taxation) Circle…ITA 6745/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi vs Times Content Limited( Now Known As Times…ITA 5333/DEL/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Bisleri International PVT.LTD, Mumbai vs. Principal Commissioner, Central Revenue Building, BhubaneswarOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Saraswat Infra And Projects, Sundergarh vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Kamalakanta Nayak vs. The State Tax Officer, Mayurbhanj Circle,BalasoreOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Vedvyas Logistics Private Limited, Sundargarh vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Harilal Agarwalla vs. State Tax Officer, Kendrapara CircleOrissa · 7 Oct 2026