WALCHAND CHARITABLE TRUST,MUMBAI vs. ITO EXEM. WARD 2(4), MUMBAI, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(Exemption) should adjudicate the matter afresh. The application for Section 80G renewal should be considered along with the pending application for Section 12A renewal.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for renewal of registration under Section 80G. The CIT(Exemption) rejected the application because the trust had not applied for renewal of its Section 12A registration, which was expiring soon.
What were the issues?
Whether the application for Section 80G renewal can be rejected solely on the ground of a pending Section 12A renewal application. Whether the matter should be remanded for fresh consideration.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “E” BENCH MUMBAI
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 4103/MUM/2026 Assessment Year: 2026-27 Walchand Charitable Trust Income Tax Officer 534, C/O BCMA LTD, Exemption, Ward - 2(4), SVP Road, Opera House,, Mumbai Vs. Mumbai - 400007 (PAN: AAATW0145N) (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Assessee : Shri Jayesh Dadia, CA Revenue : Smt. Amrita Singh, CIT DR Date of Hearing : 23.06.2026 Date of Pronouncement : 29.06.2026 O R D E R PER GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of Ld. CIT(Exemption), Mumbai, vide order no. ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2025- 26/1087547443(1) dated 18.03.2026, wherein assessee’s application seeking renewal of registration u/s. 80G have been rejected.
In the present case assessee has filed an application u/s. 80G(5)(ii) in Form 10AB on 30.09.2025, seeking renewal of approval u/s. 80G. Ld. CIT(E) observed that registration u/s. 12A has been granted with a validity period from Assessment Year 2022-23 to Assessment Year 2026-27, expiring on 31.03.2026. Assessee has not moved its application in Form-10AB for renewal of the said registration
2 ITA No. 4103/Mum/2026 Walchand Charitable Trust AY 2026-27
u/s. 12A. In view of this fact, he held that since regular registration u/s.12A is valid only till 31.03.2026, the present application before him for renewal u/s. 80G, even if granted, will traverse beyond the validity period of existing 12A registration i.e., 31.03.2026 which violates the section 80G(5)(i). He thus, held that approval u/s.80G cannot be granted for the period when the assessee is not having a regular registration u/s. 12A. He accordingly, held that the said application is not maintainable and thus, rejected it.
Before us, ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that through an oversight, staff in the office of the assessee inadvertently filed Form- 10AB only for renewal of registration u/s. 80G with a belief that only single form would suffice for renewal of both the registrations, i.e., u/s. 12A and u/s. 80G. When the notice of proceedings u/s. 80G was received, such an inadvertent mistake was realised and appropriate actions were immediately taken for filing of application for renewal of registration u/s. 12A along with petition for condonation of delay in filing the same.
Ld. Counsel brought to the knowledge of the Bench that the application filed in Form-10AB for renewal of registration u/s.12A, is pending before the ld. CIT(E) for due consideration. He thus, prayed that the present matter relating to approval u/s. 80G be remitted back to the file of ld. CIT(E) so that both the matters relating to renewal of registration u/s. 12A and the present matter relating to approval u/s. 80G can be taken up together.
3 ITA No. 4103/Mum/2026 Walchand Charitable Trust AY 2026-27
The learned Departmental Representative fairly submitted that she would have no serious objection if the matter is restored to the file of the learned CIT(E) for fresh consideration.
Having considered the rival submissions and the material placed on record, we are of the opinion that the ends of justice would be met if the impugned ex parte order is set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the learned CIT(E) for adjudication afresh in accordance with law. Accordingly, the impugned order of the learned CIT(E) is set aside and the matter is restored to his file with a direction to decide the application on merits and in accordance with law after affording due and effective opportunity of hearing to the assessee, more particularly along with the already pending application before him for granting of registration u/s 12A. The assessee is also directed to extend full cooperation in the appellate proceedings.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order is pronounced in the open court on 29 June, 2026
Sd/- Sd/- (Amit Shukla) (Girish Agrawal) Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated: 29 June, 2026 MP, Sr.P.S.
4 ITA No. 4103/Mum/2026 Walchand Charitable Trust AY 2026-27
Copy to : 1 The Appellant 2 The Respondent 3 DR, ITAT, Mumbai 4 Guard File 5 CIT BY ORDER,
(Dy./Asstt.Registrar) ITAT, Mumbai Sr. Details Date Initial Designation No. 1. Draft dictated on Sr.PS/PS 2. Draft Placed before author Sr.PS/PS 3. Draft proposed & placed JM/AM before the Second Member 4. Draft discussed/approved JM/AM by Second Member 5. Approved Draft comes to Sr.PS/PS the Sr.PS/PS 6. Order pronouncement on 29.06.2026 Sr.PS/PS 7. File sent to the Bench 29.06.2026 Sr.PS/PS Clerk 8. Date on which the file goes to the Head clerk 9. Date on which file goes to the AR 10. Date of Dispatch of order
5 ITA No. 4103/Mum/2026 Walchand Charitable Trust AY 2026-27
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026