BLUESKY 19 LEASING COMPANY LIMITED,IRELAND vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INT TAX CIRCLE 1(2)(2) MUMBAI, MUMBAI
What were the facts?
The assessee, an Irish company, leased aircraft to an Indian airline. The Assessing Officer (AO) treated lease rentals as business income attributable to a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India. The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) upheld the AO's view.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the lease rentals are covered by Article 8 of the India-Ireland Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) and are taxable in Ireland, not India. The Tribunal also found that the MLI and PPT were not applicable.
What were the issues?
Whether lease rentals from aircraft leased to an Indian airline are taxable in India, and if the India-Ireland DTAA benefits, including Article 8, are applicable. The applicability of the Multilateral Instrument (MLI) and Principal Purpose Test (PPT) was also an issue.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144C(13),Section 153,Section 90(1),Section 270A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI “I” BENCH, MUMBAI 5th Floor, Kautilya Bhavan, C-41 to C-43, G C/o DMD Advocates 30, Block Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra Nizamuddin East, New (East), Mumbai, Delhi, Maharashtra- 400051 New Delhi- 110013. PAN/GIR No: AAJCB3564G (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA No. 3576 /MUM/2026 (AY: 2023-24) 5th Floor, Kautilya Bhavan, C-41 to C-43, G C/o DMD Advocates 30, Nizamuddin East, New Block Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra Delhi, (East), Mumbai, New Delhi- 110013. Maharashtra- 400051 PAN/GIR No: : AAJCB3562A (Appellant) (Respondent) 5th Floor, Kautilya Bhavan, C-41 to C-43, G C/o DMD Advocates 30, Block Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra Nizamuddin East, New (East), Mumbai, Delhi, Maharashtra- 400051. New Delhi- 110013. PAN/GIR No: : AAJCB3561D (Appellant) (Respondent) SA No.58,59,60 &
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 3453/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6805/MUM/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Tbea Green Energy (India) Private Limited… vs ACIT, Central Circle 1, Vadodara, GujaratITA 592/AHD/2026[2022-2023]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-2023
- At&T Communication Services India Private… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle…ITA 5593/DEL/2024[AY 2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026
- Hcy Industrial Parks Private Limited, Mumbai vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1899/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Chandan Patra, Bbsr vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Corbett Kyari Jungle Resort vs. The State Tax OfficerUttarakhand · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S N B Enterprises vs. The Assistant CommissionerUttarakhand · 6 Oct 2026
- Sumit Bhoora vs. M/ S Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Jayesh Patel vs. M/S Aasharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026