ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-5(1)(1), MUMBAI vs. FANCY DIAMONDS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition for alleged bogus purchases. The ITAT directed the AO to restrict the addition to the difference in GP rate between bogus and genuine purchases. However, the AO and CIT(A) misinterpreted this direction, leading to an incorrect calculation of the addition.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the AO and CIT(A) had misinterpreted the ITAT's directions. The addition should only be made to the extent of the difference in GP rate where the GP rate on bogus purchases was lower than that on genuine purchases.
What were the issues?
Whether the AO and CIT(A) correctly interpreted and applied the ITAT's directions regarding the calculation of addition on bogus purchases based on GP rates. Whether consequential grounds of appeal related to penalty and interest are premature.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 148,Section 271,Section 234
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JM & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, AM
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Per Arun Khodpia, AM: The two captioned appealsare preferred by the Assessee and the Revenue respectively, to challenge theorder of the Commissioner of Income Tax A
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 640/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 639/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 638/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Kishorbhai C Bhagtani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward 2(1)(1), RajkotITA 999/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Malhar Nitin Bhuptani, Rajkotq vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1054/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Bibhasa Jena vs. The Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar CommissionerateOrissa · 9 Oct 2026
- M/S Otd Logistics Express Private Limited vs. The Commissioner CGST Cx And CustomsOrissa · 9 Oct 2026
- Sangram Mallik vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And CustomsOrissa · 9 Oct 2026
- Amitabh Samal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Cuttack 1Orissa · 9 Oct 2026
- Atul Kumar vs. The SuperintendentUttarakhand · 8 Oct 2026