KUNDKUND BHARTI,GHAZIABAD vs. CIT(E), DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found the CIT(Exemption)'s order to be ex-parte and non-speaking. Therefore, to ensure justice, the matter was restored to the CIT(Exemption) for fresh consideration.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an application in Form 10AB for registration under Section 12A of the Income-tax Act. The learned CIT(Exemption) rejected the application through an ex-parte non-speaking order.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemption) passed a speaking order after providing an opportunity of hearing to the assessee for registration under Section 12A.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH-E NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.5974/Del/2026 Assessment Year 2026-27 Kundkund Bharti, Clo CA Vaibhav Goel, 75, Navyug Market, 1st Floor, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh 201 001. PAN AAATKO564D. (Appellant) Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) , Delhi. (Respondent) Appellant by Respondent by Shri Vaibhav Goel, CA Shri Raghunath, CIT-DR: Date of hearing Date of pronouncement 22.06.2026 29.06.2026 ORDER Per Bench: This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of learned CIT(Exemption) , Delhi dated 5th March, 2026 whereby the application of the assessee in Form 10AB for registration under Section 12A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act') was rejected. 2 We have heard the arguments of both the sides and perused the material placed before uS_ It is observed that the learned CIT(Exemption) has passed an ex-parte non-speaking order. In the above circumstances, after hearing the arguments of both the sides and perusal of record, we are of the view that it would be in the interest of justice to restore the matter to learned CIT(Exemption) for fresh consideration_ Accordingly, we set aside the impugned order of 2 ITA No.5974Del/2026 learned CIT(Exemption) with a direction to decide the matter afresh after affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee and thereafter, pass a speaking order in accordance with law. 3 In the result; the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Decision pronounced in the open Court on 29th June, 2026. (MANISH AGARWAL) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (MAHAVIR SINGH) VICE PRESIDENT Date 29.06.2026 VK.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026