NEELAM GUPTA,JIND vs. DCIT, BHIWANI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Section 115BBE, which enhances tax rates, is applicable only from AY 2018-19 onwards. Therefore, the surrendered income should be taxed at normal rates, not under Section 115BBE.
What were the facts?
During a survey, the assessee surrendered an amount of Rs 45,00,500 and paid tax at normal rates by treating it as business income. The Assessing Officer sought to apply the enhanced tax rate of 60% under Section 115BBE.
What were the issues?
Whether the enhanced tax rate under Section 115BBE is applicable to income surrendered during a survey for AY 2017-18.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “B”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI M. BALAGANESH & SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “B”: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 9136/Del/2025 (Assessment Year: 2017-18) Neelam Gupta, Vs. DCIT, M/s. Neelam Bhiwani Circle, Utrasound, Bhiwani Vivekanand nagar, Jind, Haryana (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: ABZPG8430G
Assessee by : Shri Subhash Saini, Adv Revenue by: Shri Rajesh Kumar Dhanesta, Sr. DR (VC) Date of Hearing 28/04/2026 Date of pronouncement 29/04/2026
O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH, A. M.: 1. The appeal in ITA No.9136/Del/2025 for AY 2017-18, arises out of the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Gurgaon [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. CIT(A)’, in short] dated 23.10.2025 against the order of assessment passed u/s 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) dated 30.12.2019 by the Assessing Officer, DCIT, Circle, Bhiwani (hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. AO’).
The only effective issue involved in this appeal is as to whether the Learned CITA was justified in confirming the action of the Learned AO in applying enhanced tax rate of 60% under section 115BBE of the Act in respect of amount surrendered during the survey action in the sum of Rs 45,00,500 in the facts and circumstances of the instant case.
ITA No. 9136/Del/2025 Neelam Gupta
We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. It is not in dispute that pursuant to survey, a sum of Rs 45,00,500 stood offered by the assessee and tax at normal rates was paid by the assessee by treating the additional offer as business income. The Learned AO sought to apply the enhanced rate of tax @ 60% under section 115BBE of the Act for the said surrendered income. This action of the Learned AO was upheld by the Learned CITA. We find that the Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of of SMILE Microfinance Limited vs ACIT in WP (MD) No. 2078 of 2020 and WMP (MD) No. 1742 of 2020 dated 19-11-2024 had held that the provisions of section 115BBE of the Act which enhanced the rate of tax could be made applicable only from 01.04.2017, relevant to assessment year 2018-19 onwards and not earlier. Hence we direct the Learned AO to tax the surrendered sum of Rs 45,00,500 at normal rates and not at the rates prescribed under section 115BBE of the Act. Accordingly, grounds raised by the assessee are allowed.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 29/04/2026.
-Sd/- -Sd/- (ANUBHAV SHARMA) (M. BALAGANESH) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 29/04/2026 A K Keot Copy forwarded to 1. Applicant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR:ITAT Page | 2
ITA No. 9136/Del/2025 Neelam Gupta
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, New Delhi
More judgments on Section 115BBE
- Vishal Kumar Patel(HUF), Raipur vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), RaipurITA 595/RPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Pramod Kumar Behera vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- Santosh Kumar Pradhan (Late Biswabhar Pradhan) vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise And Customs, BhubaneswarOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- Mrs. Sharma Glass And Plywoods vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerKarnataka · 4 Nov 2026
- Fino Payments Bank Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 4 Nov 2026
- Sri Mohanraj vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 4 Nov 2026