MUKESH GARG THROUGH LEGALA HEIR GAURAV GARG,DELHI vs. ITO WARD 51(3), DELHI
What were the facts?
The appellant, Sh. Gaurav Garg, claimed to be the legal representative of the deceased assessee, Late Sh. Mukesh Garg. The appellant did not provide any evidence of succeeding to or managing the deceased's estate.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appellant failed to establish his status as a legal representative as defined by law. Therefore, the appeal was rejected at this stage.
What were the issues?
Whether the appellant qualifies as a legal representative of the deceased assessee to pursue the appeal. Whether the department has initiated proceedings against the appellant under Section 159 of the Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: “SMC” NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA
This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2017-18, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/Addl./JCIT(A)- 1, Coimbatore’s order dated 12.02.2026 having DIN and order no. ITBA/APL/S/250/2025-26/1085921424(1), involving proceedings under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
It next emerges with the able assistance coming from the Revenue side that the appellant herein Sh. Gaurav Garg claims himself to be the “legal representative” of the assessee Late Sh. Mukesh Garg, who is stated to have left for his heavenly abode on 17.05.2021. Faced with this situation, I note that there is not even an iota of indication in the a
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 159
- Late Bhoodev Singh Through L/H Bimla Devi… vs ITO Ward 68(8), DelhiITA 8284/DEL/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Nandakumari Karlapudi, Guntur vs Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)…ITA 487/VIZ/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Jyoti Satish Naik As Wife and Legal Heir of… vs ITO, Ward 4(4), ThaneITA 2373/MUM/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2010-11
- Chandrikaben Ratilal Soni Lr Harshadbhai… vs Income Tax Officer Ward 5(2)(2), AhmedabadITA 1293/AHD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Rajender Singh (Through Legal Heir Deepak)… vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 1, SonipatITA 4293/DEL/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed1 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sri Kamatchi Agencies vs. The Deputy Commissioner (Appeal)Madras · 6 Oct 2026
- Dr S.Surya Prakash vs. The Secretary TO GovernmentMadras · 6 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax Midnapore Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Sanmargg Agrotrade INDIA Private Limtied And Anr. vs. Superintendent Central Tax Group-36 Circle-08 Office Of The Commissioner Of Central Tax And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Ramkrishna Datta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026