DCIT, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD vs. ALIGARH DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ALIGARH
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order which allowed exemption under sections 11 and 12 to the Aligarh Development Authority. The Assessing Officer had denied exemption, treating the authority's receipts from development fees, conversion charges, etc., as commercial in nature.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the activities of the Aligarh Development Authority are charitable in nature, as they are sovereign functions for the state and not trade or commerce for profit. Therefore, the Assessing Officer was not justified in denying exemption.
What were the issues?
Whether the activities of a development authority constitute charitable purposes or commercial activities, and consequently, whether it is eligible for exemption under Sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 2(15),Section 11,Section 12,Section 11(4A),Section 10(46A)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘E’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER MAHAVIR SINGH, VP :
The captioned 04 Appeals are filed by the Revenues against the orders of Ld.
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals/ National Faceless Appeal Centre (‘Ld.
CIT(A)/NFAC’ for short), New Delhi dated 25/9/2025 pertaining to Assessment Years A.Y 2016-17, A.Y 2017-18, A.Y 2018-19 & A.Y 2021-22 respectively.
As the Department preferred the captioned Appeals against single Assessee having identical issues to be decided, the above appeals were heard together. For the sake of convenience grounds of Appeal for Assessment Year 2016-17 are reproduced as under:- “1. The
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 2(15)
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 634/CHANDI/2024[2016-17]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 633/CHANDI/2024[2015-16]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Shri Digambar Jain Siddha Kshetra… vs Anoop Singh, CIT(E), BhopalITA 792/IND/2026[NA]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Pabitra Kumar Prusty vs. The Chief Commissioner , CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Innojet Projects Private Limited, Khorda vs. The Joint Commissioner Of State Tax (Appeal) Central Tax And Goods And Services Tax, BhubaneswarOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S.Ganjam Galaxy Bhapur Barkatulla Street, Ganjam vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Lalu Kumar Bagh vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Koraput Range, KoraputOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Bhanu Metal Industries And Ors vs. Union Of INDIA And OrsCalcutta · 7 Oct 2026