GEETIKA ANAND GUPTA,DELHI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the matter to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication on merits. The assessee was given an opportunity to be heard and furnish documentary evidence.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed long-term capital gains on the sale of a residential flat, but the AO treated it as short-term capital gains. The CIT(A) upheld this decision, stating that basic documents were not filed.
What were the issues?
Whether the capital gains on the sale of a residential flat should be treated as long-term or short-term, and the adequacy of documentary evidence presented.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH, C: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH & SMT. RENU JAUHRI
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH, C: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SMT. RENU JAUHRI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.- 2365/Del/2026 [Assessment Year: 2020-21] Geetika Anand Gupta, The Income Tax Officer, F-11, Lajpat Nagar-111 110024, Ward 54(1), Delhi. Vs Civic Centre, New Delhi-110002. PAN- AAOPA8087B Assessee Revenue Assessee by Shri Sreeman Narayana, Adv. (VC) Revenue by Adjournment application by Ms. Sunita Yonzone, ITO on behalf of Sr. DR is rejected Date of Hearing 29.06.2026 Date of Pronouncement 29.06.2026 ORDER Per Renu Jauhri, Accountant Member:
This appeal by the assessee is against order dated 06.01.2026 of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, [hereinafter referred to as the ‘Ld. CIT(A)] arising out of the Assessment Order dated 16.01.2025 passed under section 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) by the
ITA No.- 2365/Del/2026 Gee�ka Anand Gupta . Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department (hereinafter referred to as the ‘AO’) pertaining to Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2020-21. 2. The assessee has raised as many as 14 grounds of appeal but the sole substantive issue pertains to disallowance of the claim of long term capital gains on sale of residential flat which was treated as short term capital gains by the AO and subsequently, in appeal, was upheld by Ld. CIT(A). The assessee is aggrieved by the order of the Ld. CIT(A) who did not consider the allotment letter dated 16.01.2011 and other evidences and observed that basic documents were not filed before him. 3. After considering the material on record, and hearing the Ld. AR, we deem it appropriate to restore the matter back to the CIT(A), in the interest of justice, for fresh adjudication on merits. Needless to add, the assessee shall be given reasonable opportunity of being heard and to furnish requisite documentary evidences. Further, the assessee is also directed to be vigilant and make due compliance before the CIT(A) to enable fresh adjudication on merits. 4. In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 29.06.2026.
Sd/- Sd/- [SUNIL KUMAR SINGH] [RENU JAUHRI] JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA No.- 2365/Del/2026 Gee�ka Anand Gupta . Dated- 30.06.2026. Pooja. Copy forwarded to: 1. Assessee 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR
Asst. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi,
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026