DCIT CIRCLE-5, PUNE, PMT BUILDING vs. SHAH BAFNA ASSOCIATES, PUNE
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order allowing deduction under Section 80-IB(10) and deleting the addition for deemed rent. The assessee, a builder, claimed deduction for a housing project, which the AO disallowed citing violations of time limits and allotment rules.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, following its own previous decisions in the assessee's own case for earlier assessment years. The Tribunal found no change in facts and circumstances and no adverse material presented by the Revenue.
What were the issues?
Eligibility for deduction under Section 80-IB(10) for a housing project and taxability of deemed rent on unsold flats.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
PER VINAY BHAMORE, JM: This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 20.03.2025 passed by Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC for the assessment year 2015-16. 2. The Revenue has raised the following grounds of appeal :- “1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in holding that the assessee was eligible for deduction of Rs. 3,00,37,213/- u/s 80-1B(10) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on pro-rata basis in respect of the housing project "Costa Blanca, Baner, Pune" instead of confirming the disallowance?
2
On facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in holding that the assessee has sold two different flats
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80-IB(10)
- D R Corporation, Surat vs ACIT, Circle 1(2), SuratITA 265/SRT/2024[2013-14]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- D R Associates, Surat vs ACIT, Circle 1(2), SuratITA 264/SRT/2024[2013-14]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Atul Projects India Private Limited, MumbaiITA 5219/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- DCIT-12(2)(2), Mumbai vs M/S.Guruashish Construction Private…ITA 2512/MUM/2018[2012-13]Status: Disposed10 Aug 2026AY 2012-13
- P V Hemalatha, Kozhikode vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), KozhikodeITA 961/COCH/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Jun 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sri Kamatchi Agencies vs. The Deputy Commissioner (Appeal)Madras · 6 Oct 2026
- Dr S.Surya Prakash vs. The Secretary TO GovernmentMadras · 6 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax Midnapore Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Sanmargg Agrotrade INDIA Private Limtied And Anr. vs. Superintendent Central Tax Group-36 Circle-08 Office Of The Commissioner Of Central Tax And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Ramkrishna Datta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026