SHRI MOHRI PARSHVANATH JAIN DERASAR TRUST,TINTOI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the CIT(E)'s order and restored the matter for fresh consideration. The assessee was granted an opportunity to present its case before the CIT(E).
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for renewal of registration under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected the application without granting the assessee's request for a short adjournment to furnish documents.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) erred in rejecting the registration renewal application without granting a reasonable opportunity to the assessee to present its case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI SANJAY GARG & SHRI NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA
Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:
The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), (hereinafter referred to as “CIT(E)”), Ahmedabad dated 09.03.2026.
ITA No.796/Ahd/2026 [Shri Mohri Parshvanath Jain Derasar Trust vs. CIT(Exemption)] - 2 –
The assessee in this appeal is aggrieved by the action of the Ld. CIT(E) in rejecting the application of the assessee trust for renewal of the registration u/s.12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”).
At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee trust had sought a 10 days’ time adjournment for the requisite documents may be collected and furnished before the Ld. CIT(E). However, the Ld. CIT(E) did not grant adjournment and proceeded to decide the appeal. Ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the assessee has a fair case on merits and he may be given an opportunity to present its case before the Ld.CIT(E).
Considering the above submissions and going through the impugned order of the Ld. CIT(E), we are of the view that interests of justice will be well served, if the assessee be given an opportunity to present its case before the Ld.CIT(E). Accordingly, the impugned order of the Ld.CIT(E) in relation of the application is hereby set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the Ld.CIT(E) for decision afresh on the application of the assessee. Needless to say that the Ld.CIT(E) will give proper and adequate opportunity to the assessee to present its case and, thereafter, will decide the application on merits in accordance with law. The
ITA No.796/Ahd/2026 [Shri Mohri Parshvanath Jain Derasar Trust vs. CIT(Exemption)] - 3 –
appeal of the assessee trust is treated as allowed for statistical purpose.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee trust is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.
This Order pronounced on 30/04/2026
Sd/- Sd/- (NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA) (SANJAY GARG) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Ahmedabad; Dated 30/04/2026 S. K. SINHA True Copy आदेश क� �ितिल�प अ�े�षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 1. 2. ��यथ� / The Respondent. संबंिधत आयकर आयु� / Concerned CIT 3. 4. आयकर आयु�(अपील) / The CIT(A)- �वभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 5. 6. गाड� फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,
उप/सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt. Registrar) आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद / ITAT, Ahmedabad
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026