NARAYANAN SUNDARAMAHALINGAM RAJKUMAR,CHENNAI vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHENNAI
What were the facts?
The assessee sold agricultural land and received cash consideration over and above the registered sale deed value. A search operation unearthed evidence of this undisclosed cash receipt, leading to proceedings under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the land constituted a capital asset. While confirming a portion of the undisclosed cash consideration as taxable, it restricted the addition based on admitted amounts and insufficient evidence for the balance.
What were the issues?
Whether the agricultural land was a capital asset and the taxability of undisclosed cash consideration received on its sale.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153C,Section 132,Section 2(14)(iii),Section 56(2)(vii)(a)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K & SHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA
PER BENCH : The present appeals of the assessee are directed against the separate orders of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-20, Chennai [hereinafter referred to as “the Ld.CIT(A)”] both dated 16.12.2024, arising out of the assessment orders passed u/s.153C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as “the Act”] by the Assistant Commission
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1, JunagadhITA 836/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Late Hetalkumar Gunvantlal Soni (Through… vs ITO Ward 1(2)(3), AhmedabadITA 462/AHD/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 49/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 48/PUN/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jitin Batra Proprietor Of M/S. Dreamz Conference And Event Management Group vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 60 & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Saraogi vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, Howrah And Kadamtala Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 7 Oct 2026
- Neeraj Massey vs. Assistant CommissionerUttarakhand · 7 Oct 2026
- Padu Paraja vs. The Commnr. Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- The Lead Factory vs. The Assistant Commissoner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 7 Oct 2026
