MOHAMMAD YUNUS,KALABURAGI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 & TPS, KALABURAGI
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal against disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS was dismissed by the CIT(A) due to non-compliance. The disallowances pertained to transactions under Section 194Q and hire purchase charges.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that tax was collected at source under Section 206C(1H) for the transactions in question, negating the need for TDS under Section 194Q. It also noted that declarations under Section 194C(6) were submitted for transport payments.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) are valid when tax has been collected at source under Section 206C(1H) or when valid declarations under Section 194C(6) are provided.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 40(a)(ia),Section 194Q,Section 206C(1H),Section 194C(6)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, VICE – & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY
PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, VICE – PRESIDENT
This appeal is filed by Mr. Mohammad Yunus against the appellate order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC) [ld. CIT(A)] dated 30.6.2025 wherein the appeal filed by the assessee against the assessment order dated 17.3.024 passed u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [the Act] by the National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi [ld. AO] was dismissed.
The assessee is aggrieved and in appeal before us on the two disallowances confirmed u/s. 40(a)(ia) of the Act.
The brief facts of the case show that assessee is an individual carrying on business of transportation under t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 40(a)(ia)
- R S Industech Private Limited, Gandhidham vs ITO Ward-2, GandhidhamITA 843/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- C.B. Constructions, Satara vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, SataraITA 1371/PUN/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Santosh Kumar Bhogi, Visakhapatnam vs Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 253/VIZ/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Santosh Kumar Bhogi, Visakhapatnam vs Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 253/VIZ/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Champion Omdev Construction Limited, Patna vs Asst Commissioner of Income-Tax Circle 1…ITA 72/PAT/2026[2023-2024]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2023-2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Smti Gollo Sarah vs. The Union Of INDIA And 3 OrsGauhati · 8 Oct 2026
- Abhiram Ayodhyanath Swami vs. Union Of INDIA, Dept. Of Revenue, Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 8 Oct 2026
- Shankar Prasad Gupta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Balaram Halder vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Biswa Nath Mondal vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026