KAPIL GUPTA,DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-70(1), NEW DELHI, DELHI
What were the facts?
The assessee, a resident of India, received salary from an Australian employer for services rendered in Australia. The salary was taxed in Australia, and the assessee sought to exclude it from Indian taxation based on the India-Australia DTAA.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that salary received for services rendered in Australia is not taxable in India as per Article 15 of the India-Australia DTAA. Therefore, the salary income should be excluded from the assessee's total income in India.
What were the issues?
Whether salary earned and received in Australia for services rendered in Australia is taxable in India, considering the India-Australia DTAA.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “A”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI M. BALAGANESH & MS KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL
PER M. BALAGANESH, A. M.:
The appeal in ITA No.1543/Del/2026 for AY 2020-21, arises out of the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/ ADDL/JCIT(A)-2, Surat [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. JCIT(A)’, in short] dated 23.01.2026 against the order of assessment passed u/s 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) dated 30.04.2023 by the Assessing Officer, CPC, Bangalore (hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. AO’).
The only issue to be decided in this appeal is as to whether the salary received by the assessee in Australia for services rendered in Australia would become taxable in India or not. Kapil Gupta
We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material availa
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 15
- Vinod Kumar Goenka, Mumbai vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central…ITA 5189/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Kusum Deep, Roorkee vs Income Tax Officer, RoorkeeITA 270/DDN/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed28 Jul 2026AY 2024-25
- Nilangsu Mitra, Bengaluru vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 5(3)(3), BangaloreITA 1421/BANG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed20 Jul 2026AY 2020-21
- Kushal Narendra Desai, Mumbai vs DCIT, CC6(1), MumbaiITA 5231/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed13 Jul 2026AY 2017-18
- Rajkumar Pavankumar Sharma, Makarpura vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-4(1)(7), VadodaraITA 1821/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed18 Feb 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sri Kamatchi Agencies vs. The Deputy Commissioner (Appeal)Madras · 6 Oct 2026
- Dr S.Surya Prakash vs. The Secretary TO GovernmentMadras · 6 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax Midnapore Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Sanmargg Agrotrade INDIA Private Limtied And Anr. vs. Superintendent Central Tax Group-36 Circle-08 Office Of The Commissioner Of Central Tax And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Ramkrishna Datta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026