VIKAS BOHRA,NIZAMABAD vs. ITO, WARD- 1, NIZAMABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s dismissal of the appeal in limine, stating that the assessee failed to establish sufficient cause for the delay. Consequently, the addition under Section 69A and the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) were also upheld.
What were the facts?
The assessee failed to file a return of income and did not respond to notices regarding unexplained cash deposits of Rs. 1,05,95,920/-. The Assessing Officer made additions under Section 69A, and the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal due to a delay of 224 days without adjudicating on merits.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) was sufficiently explained, and whether the addition of unexplained cash deposits and the consequent penalty were justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 69A,Section 115BBE,Section 147,Section 144,Section 144B,Section 148A,Section 271(1)(c)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad “A” Bench, Hyderabad
PER MANJUNATHA G., A.M : The above appeals are directed against separate orders of the learned CIT(A)-National Faceless Assessment Centre [in short “NFAC”], Delhi, tabulated hereinbelow. Since common issues are involved in these appeals therefore, for the sake of convenience, these appeals are clubbed together for the purpose of hearing and adjudication.
Ld. CIT(A)- NFAC, DELHI vide DIN: ITA 68/HYD
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 69A
- Vishal Kumar Patel(HUF), Raipur vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), RaipurITA 595/RPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026