SH. MUKESH JAIN,DELHI vs. DCIT, CC-26, , DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 7960/DEL/2025Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 June 2026AY 2018-196 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the notice under section 153C, issued after the statutory cut-off date of 01.04.2021, was bad in law and quashed the assessment proceedings. The handing over of incriminating material and recording of satisfaction were considered to be the triggering events.

What were the facts?

A search was conducted on the Alankrit group on 18.10.2019, leading to the discovery of documents related to the assessee. The assessee received a notice under section 153C on 15.06.2022, after the repeal of the said section effective 01.04.2021.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the assessment proceedings initiated under section 153C were valid when the notice was issued after the repeal of the section, with the date of handing over of incriminating material being the crucial factor.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 153C,Section 132,Section 69A,Section 69C

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH, E: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN & SMT. RENU JAUHRI

For Appellant: Shri Ruchesh Sinha, Adv. (V/C), Ms. Monalisa Maity, Adv
For Respondent: Shri Abhishek Kumar, CIT(DR)
Hearing: 03.06.2026Pronounced: 30.06.2026

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH, E: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SMT. RENU JAUHRI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.- 7959/Del/2025 [Assessment Year: 2017-18] Shri Mukesh Jain, DCIT, H-9, H Block, CC-26, Ashok Vihar, Vs ARA Centre Jhandewalan New Delhi-110052. Extension Delhi-110055. PAN- AADPJ6604L Assessee Revenue ITA No.- 7960/Del/2025 [Assessment Year: 2018-19] Shri Mukesh Jain, DCIT, H-9, H Block, CC-26, Ashok Vihar, Vs ARA Centre Jhandewalan New Delhi-110052. Extension Delhi-110055. PAN- AADPJ6604L Assessee Revenue

Assessee by Shri Ruchesh Sinha, Adv. (V/C) Ms. Monalisa Maity, Adv Revenue by Shri Abhishek Kumar, CIT(DR) Date of Hearing 03.06.2026 Date of Pronouncement 30.06.2026

ITA No.- 7959 and 7960/Del/2025 Mukesh Jain ORDER Per Renu Jauhri, Accountant Member:

These two appeals by the Assessee are directed against the two separate orders dated 03.10.2025 and 11.09.2025 of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)- 25, New Delhi-110055, [hereinafter referred to as the ‘Ld. CIT(A)] arising out of the Assessment Order dated 27.02.2024 passed under section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘the Act’) by the Assessing Officer, DCIT, Central Circle-26, New Delhi, (hereinafter referred to as the ‘AO’) pertaining to Assessment Years (A.Ys.) 2017-18 and 2018-19. 2. Additional Grounds of appeal filed by the Assessee (ITA No.- 7959/Del/2025 for A.Y. 2017-18) are reproduced as under: "That the jurisdiction of the Ld. AO in passing the assessment order U/s 153C is vitiated in the present case, as in this case, the search was conducted on 18.10.2019 and the notice U/s 153C was issued after 1.04.2021, whereas the provisions of section did not exist after 1.04.2021 and hence the assessment proceedings are bad in law for the want of jurisdiction." "That it is a trite law that the date of handing over of the documents/recording of the satisfaction note, is to be considered as the triggeringdate in the case of the other person, and such date in the present case, falls after 1.04.2021, when the provisions of section 153C were already repealed." "That in the present facts of the matter, the Ld. AO does not have the jurisdiction to conduct assessment proceedings U/s 153C of the Income Tax Act in the case of the appellant and reliance in this regard is placed on the judgment of Harigovind v. ACIT [2025] 180 taxmann.com 197 (Madras) and other similar matters."

ITA No.- 7959 and 7960/Del/2025 Mukesh Jain 2.1 Additional Grounds of appeal filed by the Assessee (ITA No.- 7960/Del/2025 for A.Y. 2018-19) are reproduced as under: "That the jurisdiction of the Ld. AO in passing the assessment order U/s 153C is vitiated in the present case, as in this case, the search was conducted on 18.10.2019 and the notice U/s 153C was issued after 1.04.2021, whereas the provisions of section did not exist after 1.04.2021 and hence the assessment proceedings are bad in law for the want of jurisdiction." "That it is a trite law that the date of handing over of the documents/recording of the satisfaction note, is to be considered as the triggeringdate in the case of the other person, and such date in the present case, falls after 1.04.2021, when the provisions of section 153C were already repealed." "That in the present facts of the matter, the Ld. AO does not have the jurisdiction to conduct assessment proceedings U/s 153C of the Income Tax Act in the case of the appellant and reliance in this regard is placed on the judgment of Harigovind v. ACIT [2025] 180 taxmann.com 197 (Madras) and other similar matters."

3.

By way of the additional grounds, the assessee has challenged the validity of proceedings u/s 153C of the Act. As issues are common in both the appeals, A.Y. 2017-18 (ITA No.- 7959/Del/2025) is taken up first as the lead case.

3.1 Brief facts are that the assessee had filed original return declaring income of Rs. 67,86,900/- for A.Y. 2017-18 on 18.10.2017. On 18.10.2019, a search u/s 132 of the Act was conducted on the Alankrit group of cases, wherein it was found that the group entities were providing accommodation entries to different persons. During the course of search, some incriminating documents were also found relating to the assessee and thereafter his case was centralized.

ITA No.- 7959 and 7960/Del/2025 Mukesh Jain 3.2 A notice u/s 153C was issued on 15.06.2022 in response to which the assessee filed his return on 07.10.2023 declaring income of Rs. 67,86,900/-. Assessment was subsequently completed vide order dated 27.02.2024, at an income of Rs. 98,76,900/- after making addition u/s 69A & 69C of the Act in respect of bogus transactions of Rs. 30,00,000/- undertaken by the assessee and commission paid of Rs. 90,000/- thereon respectively.

3.3. Aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A), which was dismissed vide order dated 11.09.2025. Further aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal.

4.

Before us, Ld. AR has submitted that the proceedings u/s 153C are invalid as the notice was issued on 15.06.2022 and the provisions of section 153C were already repealed w.e.f. 1.4.2021. He has pointed out that the date of search in the case of ‘other person’ is to be taken as the date of handing over of incriminating material to the AO of such other person as per the provisions of section 153C of the Act. In the present case, it has been pointed out that since the incriminating material was handed over and notice u/s 153C was issued long after 1.4.2021, the proceedings are invalid in view of the provisions of section 153C(3), which provides that the provisions of this section do not apply to any search initiated on or after 1.4.2021.

ITA No.- 7959 and 7960/Del/2025 Mukesh Jain 4.1 On the other hand, the Ld. DR has argued that the search in this case was conducted in 2019 and therefore the proceedings have been validity initiated. Moreover, this issue has not been raised before the lower authorities and, therefore, the same cannot be entertained at this stage.

5.

We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. We note that even though the search action in the case of Alankrit Group was conducted on 18.10.2019, the incriminating material was handed over to the AO of the assessee much later, apparently after 1.4.2021 based on which notice u/s 153C was issued on 15.06.2022. Ld. DR has not been able to controvert the claim of the AR regarding, handing over of incriminating material after 1.4.2021 and recording of satisfaction u/s 153C after the prescribed cut off date, despite being specifically directed to file requisite details and evidences in support of his contentions.

5.1 Hence, we are inclined to agree with the Ld. AR that the notice u/s 153C dated 15.06.2022 having been issued beyond the statutory cut-off date is bad in law and hence the same is hereby quashed.

6.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.

ITA No.- 7960/Del/2025

7.

Since the facts and issues involved in the present appeal are identical to those adjudicated in ITA No. 7959/Del/2025, the findings and reasoning recorded therein 5

ITA No.- 7959 and 7960/Del/2025 Mukesh Jain are respectfully adopted mutatis mutandis. Accordingly, the present appeal in ITA No. 7960/Del/2025 is also allowed on the same terms.

8.

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 30.06.2026.

Sd/- Sd/- [RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN] [RENU JAUHRI] JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated- 30.06.2026. Pooja. Copy forwarded to: 1. Assessee 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR

Asst. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi,

More judgments on Section 153C

All 9,619 judgments and leading authorities on Section 153C →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →