SUPER FIN SERVICES,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 3(3)(5), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against the CIT(A)'s order upholding the disallowance of partner remuneration. The CIT(A) had dismissed the assessee's appeals against CPC rectification orders. Subsequently, the CPC passed fresh orders allowing the assessee's claim for deduction of remuneration to partners.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that subsequent orders from the CPC allowed the assessee's claim for deduction of remuneration to partners. Therefore, the appeals filed by the assessee had become infructuous.
What were the issues?
Whether the disallowance of remuneration to partners was justified, and if subsequent favorable orders render the appeal infructuous.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “C” BENCH
Before: Shri Tapas Ram Misra & Shri R. Govindarajan
PER R. GOVINDARAJAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The assessee has filed the appeals against the two orders dated 18- 02-2026 passed by Addl. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Kochi (in short, referred to as the CIT(A)) u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (herein referred to as “the Act”) relating to Assessment Year 2020-21 & 2021-22 respectively.
As common issue is involved in both assessment years, both appeals are disposed of in this common order.
Assessee’s grounds of appeals for both the assessment years are as follows:
“1. The order passed by the Ld. CIT (A) is against law, equity & natural justice.
I.T.A Nos. 1388 & 1389/Ahd/2026 Supe
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 40(b)
- Morlidhar B Vamdote, Bardoli vs ITO, Ward-1, BardoliITA 1174/SRT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- M/S Prashant Fruit Company, Alwar vs ITO, Ward-1(1), AlwarITA 1557/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- M/S Prashant Fruit Company, Alwar vs ITO, Ward-1(1), AlwarITA 1549/JPR/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Super Fin Services, Ahmedabad vs Income Tax Officer Ward 3(3)(5), AhmedabadITA 1389/AHD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Seyyadurai Constructions, Ramnad vs ACIT, Central Circle-3(1), ChennaiITA 1948/CHNY/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Prakash Enterprises Its Proprietor Sudhir Kumar Choudhary vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Sree Narayan Construction vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Recro Furniture Private Limited vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 6 Oct 2026
- Ipca Laboratories LTD. vs. Union Of INDIA Through The Jt. Secretary, Dept. Of Revenue, Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 6 Oct 2026
- Scottment Alco Bev Fillers PVT LTD vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026