MEDICANA PRIVATE LIMITED ,PATNA vs. ASSEESSMENT UNIT , DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found the CIT(A)'s order to be ex-parte and not deciding all grounds on merits. In the interest of justice, the case was restored to the Assessing Officer for de-novo assessment.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal against the CIT(A)'s ex-parte order for AY 2021-22 was heard. The assessee admitted to not making proper compliance before the lower authorities.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) order was passed in violation of natural justice due to lack of assessee's participation and non-adjudication of all grounds. Whether the case should be remanded for de-novo assessment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PATNA “DB” BENCH
Before: SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. & SHRI RAKESH MISHRA
PER YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This Appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of the NFAC, Delhi (‘Ld. CIT(A)’ for short) dated 13.10.2025, passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”, for short) for the Assessment Year 2021-22. 2. Brief facts of the case are that, an Assessment Order came to be passed u/s 144 r.w.s. 144B of the Act on 23.12.2022 by making certain additions. Aggrieved by the Assessment Order dated 23.12.2022, Assessee preferred an Appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) vide Order dated 13.10.2025, dismissed the Appeal of the Medicana Private Limited; A.Y: 2021-22 Assessee. As against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) dated 13.10.2025, Assessee preferr
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144B
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Mohammed Javed Bhati, Sikar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, SikarITA 994/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2124/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026