ISLAM KHAN,BANAHI DALTONGANJ vs. ITO WARD 3(5) DALTONGANJ, DALTONGANJ
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the issues to the file of the CIT(A) for re-adjudication. The CIT(A) is directed to grant the assessee an adequate opportunity of being heard and to examine the admissibility of fresh evidence under Rule 46A.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an ex parte order from the NFAC. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) also passed ex parte orders, with no evidence produced by the assessee before the lower authorities.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) correctly admitted fresh evidence without proper verification and opportunity to the assessee, and whether the ex parte orders passed by the lower authorities were justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Rule 46A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “RANCHI BENCH, RANCHI
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY
Per Bench: This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the NFAC, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as the ‘CIT(A)’] in appeal no. NFAC/2018-19/10375462 dated 23.07.2025 for the assessment year 2019-20. 2. None represented on behalf of the assessee and Shri Sandipan Khan, Sr. DR represented on behalf of the revenue.
A perusal of the facts in the present appeal shows that the orders of the Assessing Officer and also the ld. CIT(A) are ex parte orders. It is to be mentioned here that as no evidences have been produced by the assessee before the Assessing Officer, obviously the ld. CIT(A) would have to consider applicability of provisions of rule 46A. The assessee should explain why he has not produced such evidences before the lower aut
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026