SHREE SWAMI GHANSHYAM JIWANDAS WELFARE ASSOCIATION,VALSAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), SURAT, SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the exemption under Section 11 should not be denied solely due to the delay in furnishing the audit report. It is sufficient if the report is furnished at a later stage, either before the Assessing Officer or the CIT(A).
What were the facts?
The assessee, a trust running a school, claimed exemption under Section 11 for AY 2020-21. The exemption was denied because the audit report in Form 10B was filed belatedly, even though it was filed before the processing of the return under Section 143(1).
What were the issues?
Whether denial of exemption under Section 11 is justified solely on the ground of belated filing of Form 10B, and if the CIT(A) has the power to condone such delays.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: Shri T.R. Sentil Kumar & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SURAT BENCH, SURAT (PHYSICAL HEARING) Before: Shri T.R. Sentil Kumar, Judicial Member And Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Accountant Member ITA No: 1407/SRT/2025 Assessment Year: 2020-21
Shree Swami Ghanshyam Income Tax Officer Jiwandas Welfare (Exemption) Association Vs Surat C/o CA Himanshu Gandhi 16th Floor, D Wing, Trade World Tower, Kamala Mills Compound, (Respondent) Lower Parel, Mumbai-400013 PAN: AAHTS2380N (Appellant) Assessee Represented: Shri Brijesh Vyas, A.R. Revenue Represented: Ms. Neerja Sharma, Sr. D.R. Date of hearing : 07-05-2026 Date of pronouncement : 06.07.2026 आदेश/ORDER PER : T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:-
This appeal is filed by the Assessee as against the appellate order dated 01.10.2025 passed by the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax/JCIT (Appeals)-3, Mumbai (in short referred to as “Ld. Addl./JCIT(A)”) arising out of the intimation order passed u/s. 143(1) of the Income Tax Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Year 2020-21.
I.T.A No. 1407//SRT/2025 A.Y. 2020-21 Page No 2 Shree Swami Ghanshyam Jiwandas Welfare Association vs. ITO (Exemption)
Brief facts of the case are, the assessee is a Trust running primary and secondary high school in the name of Shree Swaminarayan Vidhyalay. For the Ay 2020-21, the assessee filed its return of income on 31.03.2021 and claimed exemption u/s 11 of the Act. The assessee filed audit report in Form 10B on 31.03.2021, the delay is due to COVID 19 Pandemic. The return was processed u/s 143(1) on 30.11.2021 and denied exemption u/s 11 on the ground that audit report in Form 10B filed belatedly. 3. Aggrieved against the same, assessee filed an appeal before Ld. Addl./JCIT(A), who dismissed the appeal that he has no power to condone the delay in filing Form 10B. 4. Aggrieved against the same, assessee is in appeal before us, raising following grounds of appeal:- Ground 1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in denying the exemption under section 11 of Income Tax Act, 1961 on mere ground that Form 10B and income tax return was not filed by the appellant trust within due date Ground 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case and law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in denying exemption under section 11 of Income Tax Act, 1961 on account of claim of Revenue expenditure of Rs. 67,34,718 and Capital Expenditure of Rs. 19,61,035 merely on the ground that no audit report in form 10B was uploaded and therefore, appellant was not eligible for claiming exemption under section 11 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Ground 3. On the facts and circumstances of the case and law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in not considering the audit report in form 10B filed by the appellant on 31.03.2021 at the time of filing of return of income Ground 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case and law, the Ld. CIT(A) failed to considered that the he has inherited power to condone the delay in filling form 10B of Income Tax Act, 1961 Ground 5. Without Prejudice to Above, on the facts and circumstances of the case and law, the Ld CIT(A) erred in taxing gross receipts of Rs. 81,72,487/- while denying the exemption u/s 11 of Income Tax Act, 1961 without considering the appellant as an AOP and failed to allow the claim of revenue expenditure of Rs. 67,34,718/- and Depreciation of capital assets
I.T.A No. 1407//SRT/2025 A.Y. 2020-21 Page No 3 Shree Swami Ghanshyam Jiwandas Welfare Association vs. ITO (Exemption)
Ground 6. Appellant craves leave to add further grounds OR to amend OR alter the existing grounds of appeal on OR before the Re date of hearing
We have heard rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. This issue of late filing of Form 10B is not more res integra by various decisions of the Jurisdictional High Court as well as Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal. Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the case of S.M.K.R Vashi High School Vs. Income-tax Officer Exemption reported in [2023] 157 taxmann.com 702 (Surat-Trib.), considered Jurisdictional High Court judgment and held as follows:- ………………. 16. Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Gujarat Oil & Allied Industries (supra), held that where an assessee could not file audit report along with return of income but filed it later before completion of assessment before the Assessing Officer, the assessee was entitled to claim deduction. We note that the law in this regard is settled that benefit of exemption under section 11 and 12 should not be denied merely on account of delay in furnishing the audit report, and it would be sufficient compliance, if the audit report is furnished at a later stage either before the assessing officer during the assessment proceedings or before the ld.CIT(A) in the appellate proceedings. Therefore, at the cost of repetition, we state that assessee has filed Form No. 10B on 4-8- 2022 (after filing return of income) but before the assessment/intimation under section 143(1) was made by the Department. The intimation/assessment order was framed under section 143(1) of the Act, on 23-8-2022, hence Form No. 10B was available before the Assessing Officer/CPC, at the time making the assessment/processing the return of income of the assessee. The assessee could not attend the communication due to IT-website technical glitches, however has eventually filed the audit report in Form No 10B on 4-8-2022 and complied with the condition laid in section 12A(1)(b) so as to entitle for a claim of exemption envisaged under sections 11 and 12 of the Act, hence we delete the disallowances made by the Assessing Officer and allow the appeal of the assessee. ………………
Respectfully following the decision of the Jurisdictional High Court, the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby allowed.
I.T.A No. 1407//SRT/2025 A.Y. 2020-21 Page No 4 Shree Swami Ghanshyam Jiwandas Welfare Association vs. ITO (Exemption)
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed. 7.
Order is pronounced under provision of Rule 34 of ITAT Rules, 1963 on 06 -07-2026.
Sd/- Sd/- (RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY) (T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated 06/07/2026 Mittali आदेश क� �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. Assessee 2. Revenue 3. Concerned CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. Guard file. By order/आदेश से,
उप/सहायक पंजीकार आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, सूरत
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ayush Bamaniya vs. State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Secretary Ministry Of Home AffairsMadhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Patidar vs. Bank Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Ritik vs. State Of M.P.Madhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Lokesh vs. Bank Of Maharashtra Through Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Arvind Lunawat vs. Axis Bank LimitedMadhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026