VIDIT GARG,INDORE vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, GWALIOR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee was non-compliant throughout the assessment and penalty proceedings. The arguments presented by the assessee were found to be meritless and unsupported by material evidence, thus sustaining the penalty order.
What were the facts?
The assessee failed to comply with notices issued under Section 142(1) of the Income Tax Act for multiple assessment years. Despite opportunities, the assessee remained non-compliant, leading to the imposition of a penalty under Section 271(1)(b). The CIT(A) upheld this penalty.
What were the issues?
Whether the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(b) for non-compliance with notices was justified, and whether the assessee had a reasonable cause for non-compliance.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 142(1),Section 153C,Section 144,Section 271(1)(b),Section 271A(1)(d),Section 273B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI MANISH BORAD & SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI
PER BENCH:
ITANo.586/Ind/2026:
This is an Appeal filed by the Assessee under section 253 of the Income tax Act 1961,[ herein after referred to as the Act
for the sake of brevity] before this tribunal as & by way of a second Appeal. The Assessee is aggrieved by the order
bearing Number:-CIT(A)-3,Bhopal/IT/11050/2014-15 dated
Vidit Garg ITA No. 586 to 592/Ind/2026 AY-2015-16 to 2021-22 31.03.2025 passed by the Ld. CIT(A) u/s 250 of the Act
which is hereinafter referred as the “Impugned Order”. The Relevant Assessment Year is 2015-16 and the corresponding
Previous Period is from 01/04/2014 to 31/03/2015. This appeal no. is taken as a lead case amongs
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 142(1)
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gaurav Jiteshbhai Joshi, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1000/RJT/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Vikas Ashokkumar Masand, Ahmedabad vs The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3130/AHD/2026[A.Y. 2017-18]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026