MODI EDUCATION SOCIETY,PUNJAB vs. ITO EXEMPTIONS WARD, CHANDIGARH , CHANDIGARH

PDF · subscribers
ITA 719/CHANDI/2026Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh06 July 2026AY 2027-282 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored the issue of registration back to the CIT(Exemptions) for de novo consideration. The assessee was directed to plead and prove its case forthwith.

What were the facts?

The assessee's application for registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) was rejected by the CIT(Exemptions) due to a lack of requisite submissions. The assessee requested another opportunity to present its case.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee should be granted another opportunity to submit documents for registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) after the initial rejection.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, CHANDIGARH

Before: HON’BLE SHRI LALIET KUMAR, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, CHANDIGARH PHYSICAL HEARING BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI LALIET KUMAR, JM AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.719/CHANDI/2026 Modi Education Society CIT (Exemptions) Opposite Fire Bridge, Passey Road बनाम/ Vs. Aayakar Bhawan, Sector – 17 Patiala, Punjab – 147001 Chandigarh �ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AAAAM-0863-E (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) : (��थ� / Respondent) अपीलाथ�कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Sh. Parikshit Aggarwal (CA) – Ld. AR ��थ�कीओरसे/Respondent by : Sh. Rajat Kumar Kureel (CIT) - Ld. DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing : 29-06-2026 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement 06-07-2026 : आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1. Aggrieved by rejection of an application seeking registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(ii) vide impugned order dated 03.03.2026 of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh [CIT(E)], the assessee is in further appeal before us. Upon perusal of para 2.2 of the impugned order, it could be seen that the registration has been denied for want of requisite submissions / documents from the assessee. The Ld. AR stated that the assessee is in a position to substantiate its

registration application in case another opportunity of hearing is granted to the assessee which has been opposed by Ld. CIT-DR. 2. Keeping in mind the principles of natural justice, we accept the prayer of the assessee and restore the issue of registration back to Ld. CIT(E) for de novo consideration with a direction to the assessee to plead and prove its case forthwith. 3. The appeal stands allowed for statistical purpose. Order pronounced on 06th July, 2026

-Sd- -Sd- (LALIET KUMAR) (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AS Dated: 06-07-2026 आदेश की �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत /Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant 2. ��थ�/Respondent 3. आयकरआयु�/CIT 4. िवभागीय�ितिनिध/DR 5. गाड�फाईल/GF

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITAT CHANDIGARH

More judgments on Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii)

All 679 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →