SHREE RATADIA (GANESH) AATH KOTI NANI PAKSH STHANAKWASI JAIN SANGH,GUJARAT vs. ITO (EXEMPTION) WARD 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee should be granted one more opportunity to present the necessary documents. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was restored to the CIT(E) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a trust, applied for registration under Section 12AB. The CIT(E) rejected the application for non-furnishing of requisite details despite notices. The appeal was filed with a delay of 4 days, which was condoned.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee should be granted another opportunity to furnish details for registration under Section 12AB after the initial rejection due to non-compliance.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, राजकोट �यायपीठ, राजकोट। In The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rajkot Bench, Rajkot Before Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Accountant Member And Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member
आयकर अपील सं./ITA No. 873/RJT/2026 [ �नधा�रण वष�/Assessment Year: - ] Shree Ratadia (Ganesh) Aath Koti Nani ITO (Exemption) Ward 1, Rajkot Paksh Sthanakwasi Jain sangh New Aayakar Bhavan, Vatiaka, Vs. Gaushala Complex, Post Ratadia Rajkot, Gujarat 360001 (Ganesh), Taluk Mundra, Dist Kachchh, Bhuj Gujarat 370001 �थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: AABTS4605E (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) (��यथ�/Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Ramesh Chheda, Ld. AR Respondent by : Shri Ravinder Sindhu, Ld. CIT. DR Date of Hearing : 30/06/2026 Date of Pronouncement : 07/07/2026
:: ORDER :: Per, Bench: This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 08.03.2026 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption) [CIT(E)], whereby the assessee’s application for registration under Section 12AB read with Section 12A(1)(ac)(vi)(B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was rejected. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a trust and had filed an application seeking registration under Section 12AB of the Act. During the course of proceedings, the Ld. CIT(E) called upon the assessee to furnish certain details, However, the assessee did not furnish the requisite details despite issuance of notices
ITA No. 873/RJT/2026 Shree Ratadia (Ganesh) Aath Koti Nani Paksh Sthanakwasi Jain sangh and opportunities granted. Accordingly, the application filed by the assessee was rejected on the ground that no documents/details were filed even after issuance of notices. 3. At the outset, it is noticed that the present appeal has been filed with a delay of 4 days. The assessee has filed an application seeking condonation of delay explaining the reasons for the delay. Having considered the averments made in the condonation application and keeping in view the principles of substantial justice, we are satisfied that the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal within the prescribed period. Accordingly, the delay of 4 days is condoned and the appeal is admitted for adjudication. Aggrieved by the order of the CIT (E) assessee is in appal before this tribunal. 4. At the time of hearing Ld. AR submitted that the non-compliance was not deliberate and that the trust should be afforded one more opportunity to place the necessary documents on record. It was further submitted that in the interest of justice, the matter may be restored to the file of the learned CIT(E) for fresh consideration. 5. On the other hand, the Ld. DR supported the impugned order and submitted that the assessee had failed to comply with the notices issued by the learned CIT(E). 6. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. 7. We note that the application for registration has been rejected primarily for non-furnishing of requisite details. Considering that the issue relates to registration of a trust and that the matter should be decided on merits after affording adequate opportunity, we are of the view that one more opportunity deserves to be granted to the assessee. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the learned CIT(E) for fresh adjudication in accordance with law after
Page 2 of 3
ITA No. 873/RJT/2026 Shree Ratadia (Ganesh) Aath Koti Nani Paksh Sthanakwasi Jain sangh providing adequate opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is directed to comply with the notices issued by the learned CIT(E) and furnish all requisite details and documents as may be called for.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order is Pronounced in the open Court on 07/07/2026.
Sd/-- Sd/-- [ Dr. Arjun Lal Saini ] [ Shri Sonjoy Sarma ] लेखा सद�य/Accountant Member �याियक सद�य/Judicial Member राजकोट/Rajkot िदनांक/ Date: 07/07/2026 Copy of the order forwarded to : 1. The assessee 2. The Respondent 3. CIT 4. The CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT, Rajkot 6. Guard File By order //True Copy// Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Rajkot
Page 3 of 3
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026