RAKESH KUMAR,RANCHI vs. ITO WARD W2(1), RANCHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal rejected the adjournment application, noting the simplicity of the issues. The appeals were restored to the CIT(A) for readjudication on merits, with directions to provide the assessee an adequate opportunity to be heard and consider Rule 46A regarding fresh evidence.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against ex parte orders of the CIT(A) for AY 2015-16 and 2016-17. The assessee did not appear for the hearing and filed an adjournment application.
What were the issues?
Whether the ex parte orders of the CIT(A) were justified and if the assessee should be granted an opportunity for fresh adjudication on merits, considering the provisions for admitting new evidence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Rule 46A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI BENCH, RANCHI
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY
PER: BENCH
These are the appeals filed by the assessee against the separate orders of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (in short, the ld. CIT(A) in Appeal No. NFAC/2014-15/10154331 and NFAC/2015-16/10154335 both dated 03/03/2026 for the A.Y. 2015-16 and 2016-17 respectively.
None is represented on behalf of the assessee but Shri Sandipan Khan, ld. Sr.DR is represented on behalf of the revenue.
The assessee has filed adjournment application in both the appeals which reads as follows:
ITA 373 & 374/Ran/2025
As it is noticed that the issues of these appeals are very simple, therefore, the adjo
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026