PHOOLJA FOUNDATION,DELHI vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), DELHI, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the CIT (Exemptions) under section 80G. During the hearing, the assessee's counsel requested to withdraw the present appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn upon their request.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘F’: NEW DELHI
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘F’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER and SHRI VIMAL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.4282/DEL/2026 (Assessment Year : 2026-27) Phoolja Foundation, vs. CIT (Exemptions), 310, 3rd Floor, Prakashdeep Building, Delhi. Tolstoy Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001. (PAN : AAGTP1866K) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : Shri P.C. Yadav, Advocate REVENUE BY : Shri Yashvendra Singh, CIT DR Date of Hearing : 23.06.2026 Date of Pronouncement : 23.06.2026 O R D E R PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, AM :
The assessee has filed appeal against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Delhi [“Ld. CIT(E)”, for short] dated 05.03.2026 under section 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’). 2. At the time of hearing, ld. AR of the assessee submitted that inadvertently two appeals were filed against the impugned order dated 05.03.2026 and
2 ITA No.4282/Del/2026 in this regard, ld. AR requested to withdraw the present appeal being ITA No.4282/Del/2026 which was filed inadvertently. 3. In view of the above, we permit withdrawal of the appeal. Hence, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on this 23rd day of June, 2026 after the conclusion of the hearing. Sd/- sd/- (VIMAL KUMAR) (S. RIFAUR RAHMAN) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Dated : 07.07.2026 TS Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals). 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, NEW DELHI
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shree Sai Jagannath, Rourkela, Sundargarh vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, BhubaneswarOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- M/S.Shree Construction, Khordha vs. The Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- Pramod Kumar Behera vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- Santosh Kumar Pradhan (Late Biswabhar Pradhan) vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise And Customs, BhubaneswarOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- Mrs. Sharma Glass And Plywoods vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerKarnataka · 4 Nov 2026