REETA DIXIT,HARDOI vs. ITO-3(2), HARDOI, HARDOI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the issues in dispute back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment. The Assessing Officer was directed to pass a denovo order after providing a reasonable opportunity to the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an ex-parte assessment order and the subsequent appellate order confirming additions. The assessee contended that both orders were passed without providing a reasonable opportunity to be heard.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessment and appellate orders were passed in violation of natural justice principles and if the additions made under specific sections were justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH ‘SMC’, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA
PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA:A.M. (A) This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the impugned appellate order of learned CIT(A)/ National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi vide order dated 29.09.2025 for the AY 2019-20. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: “1.That the Id. CIT(A) as well as the Id. A.O. erred on facts and in law in passing ex-parte order which is in violation of the principles of natural justice and be set-a-side.
I.T.A. No. 401/Lkw/2026 Assessment Year:2019-20 2
2.That the basis of initiation of re-assessment proceeding by issue of notice u/s148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, its continuation and culmination vide order u/s 147/144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 21-03-2023 is bad in law and liable to be cancelled.
The Id. CIT(A), NFAC had erred on facts and in law in confirming the addition of Rs. 4,45,400/- under section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which is contrary to the facts and circumstances of the case.
The Id. CIT(A), NFAC had erred on facts and in law in confirming the addition of Rs. 7,08,000/- under section 56(2)(x) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as Income from Other Sources, which is contrary to the facts and circumstances of the case.”
(B) In this case, assessment order dated 03.01.2024 was passed by the Assessing Officer under section 147 r.w.s. 144 read with section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) wherein the assessee’s income was determined at Rs. 13,60,987/-. The assessee’s appeal against the assessment order was dismissed by the Learned CIT(A) vide impugned appellate order dated 29.09.2025. The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the aforesaid impugned appellate order dated 29.09.2025.
(C) At the time of hearing, the Learned Authorized Representative for the assessee submitted that the impugned appellate order and the assessment order were passed without providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee. He submitted that the issues in dispute regarding additions made in the assessment order should be restored back to the file of the Assessing Officer with the direction to pass denovo order in accordance with law after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee. The Learned Departmental Representative left the matter to the discretion of the Bench. In view of the foregoing, after hearing both sides and after due consideration of materials on
I.T.A. No. 401/Lkw/2026 Assessment Year:2019-20 3
record; having regard to submissions made by the learned Authorized Representative for the assessee, the issues in dispute regarding additions made in the assessment order are restored back to the file of the Assessing Officer, with the direction to pass denovo order in accordance with law, after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee.
(D) All grounds of appeal are treated as disposed off, in accordance with the aforesaid directions. For statistical purposes, the appeal is partly allowed.
(Order was pronounced in the open court on 08/07/2026)
Sd/- (ANADEE NATH MISSHRA) Accountant Member Date: 08/07/2026 SK, Sr.PS
Copy of the order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent. 3. Concerned CIT 4. D.R., I.T.A.T., 5. CIT(A)
Senior Private Secretary Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Lucknow
More judgments on Section 147
- Bha Associates Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs ACIT, Central Circle- 29, New DelhiITA 5208/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: Disposed6 Nov 2026AY 2015-16
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Deepak Kumar Daiya vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 4 Nov 2026
- Pawan Kumar Rajgaria vs. State Of West BengalCalcutta · 4 Nov 2026
- Mohammed Fazil vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 4 Nov 2026
- Tvl. Devaerakkam Mercy Mary vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 4 Nov 2026
- Procter And Gamble Health LTD vs. Union Of INDIATelangana · 4 Nov 2026