THE DAUGHTERS OF THE HEART OF MARY,CHENNAI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found no evidence that the assessee had withdrawn its application. Therefore, the rejection based on withdrawal was not justified.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust, applied for approval under Section 80G of the Income-tax Act. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) rejected the application, stating it was withdrawn by the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of the Section 80G approval application was valid when there was no evidence of withdrawal by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K & SHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, ‘डी’ न्यायपीठ, चेन्नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI श्री जॉजज जॉजज के, उपाध्यक्ष एवं श्री एस.आर.रघुनाथा, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.2476/Chny/2026 ननिाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : --- The Daughters of the Heart of The Commissioner of Income- Mary vs. tax (Exemption) 25, Santhome High Road Chennai. Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004. [PAN: AAATT5638H] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/Appellant by : Shri. K.Swaminathan, CA प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से/Respondent by : Shri. K.Jayaganesh, CIT सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 18.06.2026 घोर्णा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 08.07.2026 आदेश /O R D E R PER S. R. RAGHUNATHA, AM : The present appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 15.03.2026 passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chennai [hereinafter referred to as “the Ld.CIT(E)”], whereby the application filed by the assessee in Form No.10AB on 20.09.2025 seeking approval/registration u/s.80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as “the Act”], came to be rejected.
:-2-: ITA. No: 2476/Chny/2026 2. The brief facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the assessee, being a charitable trust, had filed an application in Form No.10AB on 20.09.2025 before the Ld.CIT(E), seeking approval u/s.80G of the Act. The said application, however, came to be rejected by the Ld.CIT(E) vide impugned order on the premise that the assessee had withdrawn its application for approval u/s.80G of the Act.
Aggrieved by the aforesaid order rejecting its claim for approval u/s.80G of the Act, the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal.
The Ld.AR appearing on behalf of the assessee submitted that the assessee had never furnished any communication or letter expressing its intention to withdraw the application filed in Form No.10AB seeking approval u/s.80G of the Act. It was contended that the finding recorded by the Ld.CIT(E) that the application stood withdrawn is factually incorrect and unsupported by any material available on record. The Ld. AR, therefore, prayed that the impugned order be set aside and the matter be restored to the file of the Ld.CIT(E) with a direction to adjudicate the assessee's application on merits in accordance with law.
Per contra, the Ld.DR was unable to controvert the submissions advanced on behalf of the assessee and could not point out any material evidencing withdrawal of the application by the assessee.
We have heard the rival submissions, perused the orders of the authorities below and carefully examined the material placed on record. It is an admitted position that the application filed by the assessee in Form No.10AB seeking approval u/s.80G of the Act has been rejected by the Ld. CIT(E) solely on the ground that the same had been withdrawn by the assessee. However, upon examination of the records available before us, we find that there is no communication, letter, or any other documentary evidence to indicate that the assessee had, at any point of time, withdrawn its application seeking approval u/s.80G of the Act.
:-3-: ITA. No: 2476/Chny/2026
In the absence of any material substantiating the finding recorded by the Ld. CIT(E), the rejection of the assessee's application on the premise of withdrawal cannot be sustained in the eyes of law. We are, therefore, of the considered opinion that the Ld.CIT(E) was not justified in rejecting the application filed by the assessee without examining the same on merits. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, we deem it fit and proper to set aside the impugned order of the Ld. CIT(E) and restore the assessee's application in Form No.10AB dated 20.09.2025 to his file with a direction to consider and adjudicate the same afresh on merits, in accordance with law, after affording adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the court on 08th July, 2026 at Chennai.
Sd/- Sd/- (जॉजा जॉजा के) (एस. आर. रघुनार्था) (GEORGE GEORGE K) (S. R. RAGHUNATHA) उपाध्यक्ष /VICE PRESIDENT लेखा सदस्य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER चेन्नई/Chennai, ददनांक/Dated, the 08th July, 2026. Devadas आदेश की प्रनतललपप अग्रेपर्त/Copy to: 1. अपीलार्थी/Appellant 2. प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent 3.आयकर आयुक्त/CIT– Chennai/Coimbatore/Madurai/Salem 4. पवभागीय प्रनतननधि/DR 5. गाडा फाईल/GF Digitally signed by DEVADAS DEVADAS GOPALANACHARY GOPALANACHARY Date: 2026.07.09 17:15:26 +05'30'
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Swapna Acharya vs. Superintendent, GST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar-1Orissa · 10 Nov 2026
- M/S. Ashok Panda, Dhenkanal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax , CT And GST Circle, DhenkanalOrissa · 10 Nov 2026
- M/S Sahadev Malik vs. Additional Commissioner, BhubaneswarOrissa · 10 Nov 2026
- Dillip Kumar Sethy vs. The Deputy Commissioner, CGST And Central ExciseOrissa · 10 Nov 2026
- Sri. R. Veerabhadrappa vs. The State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 6 Nov 2026