S S JAIN SABHA,FATEHABAD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(E) had not properly considered the facts and evidence, including the ongoing construction of a Dharamshala, which is a charitable activity. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(E)'s orders and remitted the matter back for reconsideration.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed applications for registration under Section 12A and 80G of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected these applications, stating the assessee was not engaged in charitable activities and had violated principles of natural justice.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of applications for registration under Section 12A and 80G was justified without proper consideration of evidence and without affording natural justice.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES, ‘A’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, िद�ी पीठ�, नई िद�ी INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCHES, ‘A’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.4549 and 4512/DEL/2026 िनधा�रण वष�/Assessment Year: 2025-26) S S JAIN SABHA COMMISSIONER OF INCOME SHOP NO. 87 ANAJ MANDI TAX (EXEMPTIONS) FATEHABAD, FATEHABAD- CR BUILDING HIMALYA Vs. 125050, HARYANA MARG SECTOR 17E CHANDIGARH-160017 अपीलाथ� Appellant ��थ� Respondent
Permanent Account Number of Assessee: ABCTS9526Q
अपीलाथ� �ारा/Appellant represented by: Shri Deepam Jain ,ADV ��थ� �ारा/Respondent represented by: Shri Rajore Satish Chandra Ramsevak, CIT DR सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of conclusion of hearing: 25.06.2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date of pronouncement: 08.07.2026 आदेश / ORDER PER BENCH
These two appeals by the assessee are directed against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Exemption), New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. CIT(E)] both dated 21.02.2026 passed under section 12AB/(1)(b)(ii) and 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The word ‘Act’ herein this order would mean Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. The appeal of the assessee vide ITA No.4549/Del/2026 is regarding the rejection of its request filed under section 80G(5)(ii) of the Act. The appeal of the assessee vide ITA No.4512/Del/2026 is regarding the rejection of its request filed under section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) of the Act. As both the appeals are of the same assessee concerning common issues of rejection of its application under section 12A and 80G, they were heard together and for the purposes of convenience, adjudicated by this common order.
At the outset, ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that its right to natural justice has been violated in as much as due opportunity of being heard has not been given before rejecting its request for grant of registration u/s 12A and 80G of the Act. The ld. Counsel submitted that its application u/s 12A has been rejected on the premise that the appellant was not engaged in any charitable activity. The ld. Counsel further argued that it had provided a large number of documents to allude that it was in the process of construction of Dharamshala, a key part of its charitable activities. It was argued that the appellant therefore cannot be accountable for not pursuing any charitable activities. The ld. Counsel accordingly requested that it be provided one last chance to defend its case and, the matter be considered for remission back to the ld. CIT(E) with directions for consideration of appellants documents and grant of registration.
The ld. DR placed reliance upon the orders of the lower authorities
We have heard rival submissions and perused the material available on record. We have noted that the Ld. CIT(E) has rejected applications of the assessee without due consideration of facts on records alluding towards a non- application of mind. We have noted that the ld. CIT(E) has dismissed assessee’s application for grant of registration under section 12A and u/s 80G purely drawing unilateral conclusions. There is nothing on record to suggest that any opportunity was given. We have also noted from the evidence of record that the construction of Dharamshala was in progress and hence a conclusion of total absence of any activity qua charitable activity cannot be drawn. Providing Dharamshala for use by the needy is a charitable activity and the construction of the Dharamshala to achieve this objective constitutes an extension of the activity. Be that as it may be in the interest of justice, we deem it appropriate to set-aside the impugned orders of the ld. CIT(E) and remit the matter of grant of registration u/s 12A as well as u/s 80G back to ld. CIT(E) for consideration. He is directed to allow the assessee grant of registration u/s 12A as well as u/s 80G. Accordingly, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA No.4549/Del/2026 and vide ITA No. 4512/Del/2026 are allowed.
Finally, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 08th July, 2026. Sd/- Sd/- [ANUBHAV SHARMA] [AMITABH SHUKLA] JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 08.07.2026 Shekhar
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Archana Agro, Nayagarh vs. The Chief Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, CuttackOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S.Shree Jagannath Associates, Angul vs. The Chief Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, CuttackOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- Sampat Raj Jain vs. The State Of Assam And 3 Ors.Gauhati · 3 Nov 2026
- Sri Hardik Gowda vs. Sri Jayaram PKarnataka · 3 Nov 2026
- Shiv Ram vs. State Of Hp And OrsHimachal Pradesh · 3 Nov 2026