ADARSH SILK BUNKAR SAHKARI SAMITI LTD.,VARANASI vs. DC/ACIT, RANGE - 3, VARANASI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the issues in dispute regarding the additions made in the assessment order back to the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer was directed to pass a denovo order after providing a reasonable opportunity to the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order which dismissed their appeal against an assessment order. The assessment order determined the assessee's income at Rs. 11,54,000/-. The assessee argued that both orders were passed without a reasonable opportunity to be heard.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessment and appellate orders were passed without providing a reasonable opportunity to the assessee. Whether the additions made under Section 69A were lawful.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VARANASI BENCH ‘SMC’, VARANASI
Before: SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA
PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA:A.M. (A) This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the impugned appellate order of learned CIT(A)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi vide order dated 13.10.2023 for the AY 2017-18. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: “1. That the learned CIT Appeal has erred in law as well as on facts in dismissing the appeal without appreciating the merits of the case. It is humbly prayed that the order of CIT Appeal being erroneous may kindly be set aside.
I.T.A. No. 231/Vns/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-18 2
The Learned CIT Appeal as well as authority below erred in law as well as on facts in sustaining addition of Rs.1154000/-u/s 69A which being unlawful may kindly be deleted. 3. That learned CIT Appeal erred in laws as well as on facts in not going through the merits of deposit and sustained addition u/s 69A.”
(B) In this case, assessment order dated 05.12.2019 was passed by the Assessing Officer under section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) wherein the assessee’s income was determined at Rs. 11,54,000/-. The assessee’s appeal against the assessment order was dismissed by the Learned CIT(A) vide impugned appellate order dated 13.10.2023. The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the aforesaid impugned appellate order dated 13.10.2023.
(C) At the time of hearing, the Learned Authorized Representative for the assessee submitted that the impugned appellate order and the assessment order were passed without providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee. He submitted that the issues in dispute regarding additions made in the assessment order should be restored back to the file of the Assessing Officer with the direction to pass denovo order in accordance with law after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee. The Learned Departmental Representative for Revenue expressed no objection to this. In view of the foregoing, after hearing both sides and after due consideration of materials on record; the issues in dispute regarding additions made in the assessment order are restored back to the file of the Assessing Officer, with the direction to pass denovo order in accordance with law, after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee.
I.T.A. No. 231/Vns/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-18 3
(D) All grounds of appeal are treated as disposed off, in accordance with the aforesaid directions. For statistical purposes, the appeal is partly allowed.
(Order was pronounced in the open court on 09/07/2026)
Sd/- (ANADEE NATH MISSHRA) Accountant Member Date: 09/07/2026 SK, Sr.PS
Copy of the order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent. 3. Concerned CIT 4. D.R., I.T.A.T., 5. CIT(A)
Senior Private Secretary Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Lucknow
More judgments on Section 69A
- Vishal Kumar Patel(HUF), Raipur vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), RaipurITA 595/RPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Satyavan vs. Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 4 Nov 2026
- Deepak Kumar Daiya vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 4 Nov 2026
- Mohammed Fazil vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 4 Nov 2026
- Tvl. Devaerakkam Mercy Mary vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 4 Nov 2026
- Procter And Gamble Health LTD vs. Union Of INDIATelangana · 4 Nov 2026