RUSTAM SHAHI,GORAKHPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER - 2(3), GORAKHPUR

ITA 223/VNS/2024Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi09 July 2026AY 2013-20143 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VARANASI BENCH ‘SMC’, VARANASI

Before: SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA

For Appellant: Shri Rustam Shahi, CA

PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA:A.M.

(A) This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the impugned appellate order of learned CIT(A)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi vide order dated 07.02.2024 for the AY 2013-14. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:

“1. That on facts and in circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate the facts of the case in the correct perspective.

2.

That on the facts and in circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in upholding the addition of Rs. 43,65,154 by Assessing Officer on account of bank deposits. Assessment Year: 2013-14 2

3.

That on the facts and in circumstances of t

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.