SUSHILA COKE AND MINERALS,HAZARIBAGH vs. ITO, WARD-2(2), HAZARIBAGH
No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI BENCH, RANCHI
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY
PER: BENCH
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (in short, the ld. CIT(A) in Appeal No. CIT(A), Hazaribagh/10139/2019-20 dated 02/07/2024 for the A.Y. 2012-13. 2. Shri Devesh Poddar, ld. A.R. is represented on behalf of the assessee and Shri Sandipan Khan, ld. Sr.DR is represented on behalf of the revenue.
The appeal of the assessee is delayed by 25 days. In this regard, the assessee has filed an application for condonation of delay stating therein sufficient reasons for delay in filing the appeal before the Tribunal, which are not found to be false. Ld. Sr.DR did not object
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.