SUDHANSHU GROVER ,NOIDA UTTAR PRADESH vs. ITO, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the ex-parte order of the CIT(A) and restored the appeal to the CIT(A). The CIT(A) was directed to decide the appeal on merits after providing a reasonable opportunity to the assessee to make submissions.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an ex-parte order passed by the CIT(A). The CIT(A) had granted only one opportunity to the assessee to present their case.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing an ex-parte order without granting a reasonable opportunity to the assessee to be heard.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI
Before: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY
PER VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal by the assessee is directed against an ex-parte order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [in short ‘the CIT(A)’] dated 10.02.2026, for Assessment Year 2018-19.
A perusal of the impugned order reveals that only one opportunity was granted to the assessee by the CIT(A). In the interest of justice, appeal is restored to the CIT(A) for deciding appeal of the assessee on merits after affording reasonable opportunity of making submissions to the assessee, in accordance with law.
The assessee shall respond to the notice(s) served by the CIT(A), without fail.
ITA 3559/DEL/2026 SUDHANSHU GROVER 4. In the result, impugned order is set aside and appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in the open court on Monday the 06th of July, 2026.
Sd/- VIKAS AWASTHY JUDICIAL MEMBER Delhi Dated: 09-July-2026
ITA 3559/DEL/2026 SUDHANSHU GROVER Copy to: SUDHANSHU GROVER , D-006, GF AJANARA GRAND HERITAGE 1 SEC-74 NOIDA UTTAR PRADESH-201301, NOIDA-201301, UTTAR PRADESH
ITO, 2 ITO DELHI, NEW DELHI-110001, DELHI
3 THE PCIT / CIT, 4 THE D.R., ITAT, DELHI BENCH 5 GUARD FILE
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026