KONAPALA VIJAYA KUMAR,RAJAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal with a delay of 119 days, citing reasons of not checking emails due to field work and a misunderstanding about communication methods. The CIT(A) had dismissed the appeal ex-parte due to non-compliance with notices.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay, citing a liberal approach towards procedural delays and the specific circumstances of the assessee. The case was remitted back to the CIT(A) for a fresh opportunity to present submissions on merits.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal can be condoned due to the assessee's misunderstanding of communication methods and the need for a fresh opportunity on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE & SHRI OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA, HON’BLE
PER OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER This appeal is filed by the Assessee against order of Learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (hereinafter in short “Ld.CIT(A)”) dated 26.08.2025 passed under section 250 of Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter in short “the Act”) for the Assessment Year 20
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80E
- Subba Rayudu Kalikiri, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward -12(6), HyderabadITA 1331/HYD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed5 Aug 2026AY 2021-22
- Subba Rayudu Kalikiri, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward- 12(6), HyderabadITA 1279/HYD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed5 Aug 2026AY 2021-22
- Guntupalli Nageswara Rao, Ibrahimpatnam vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1), VijayawadaITA 379/VIZ/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2016-17
- Guntupalli Nageswara Rao, Ibrahimpatnam vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1), VijayawadaITA 378/VIZ/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2016-17
- Gyasuddin Mohammad Ansari, Purnia vs ITO, Ward- 3 (3), PurneaITA 311/PAT/2025[2023-24]Status: Disposed29 Jan 2026AY 2023-24
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Biswa Nath Mondal vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- M/S Vibrations And Ors. vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, State Tax, Chandni Chawk And Princep Street Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Sheela Foam Limited And Anr vs. The Deputy Commissioner State Tax Shibpur Charge And OrsCalcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Mihir Kumar Biswas vs. Asst. Commissioner Of Revenue, State Tax, Krishnanagar Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Vasu Chauhan vs. State Of UttarakhandUttarakhand · 8 Oct 2026