ITO, INDORE vs. FARHAN KHAN, INDORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) correctly allowed the foreign tax credit as Form 67 was filed belatedly with all required details. The Tribunal found no inconsistency in the CIT(A)'s order and the Revenue failed to provide any binding precedent.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed foreign tax credit for taxes paid in the UK. The return was processed by CPC denying the credit due to belated filing of Form 67. The CIT(A) allowed the credit, relying on judicial precedents that Form 67 is directory, not mandatory.
What were the issues?
Whether belated filing of Form 67 bars the claim of foreign tax credit under Section 90 of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI Dr. MANISH BORAD & SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI
PER Dr. MANISH BORAD, A.M: This appeal of Assessee pertaining to A.Y. 2024-25 is directed against the order of First Appellate Authority
ITA No.985 of 2025 2
dated 25.9.2025 which is arising out of the order u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (hereinafter called as the ‘Act’) framed on 06.05.2025 by CPC.
The sole grievance of the Revenue is that the ld. CIT(A) erred in allowing foreign tax credit of Rs.25,55,529/-, even when the assessee has filed the form 67 belatedly.
We have heard the rival contentions, perused the record placed before us. We observe that the assessee is an individual and filed return of income for A.Y.2024-25 on 18.07.2024 declaring total income of Rs.97,05,780/- o
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 90
- Amar Rameshkumar Bhalodia, Rajkot vs The ACIT, Circle-1(1), RajkotITA 641/RJT/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Fireeye Ireland Limited, Ireland vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITITA 1431/DEL/2025[2022-2023]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-2023
- Archana Gupta, New Delhi vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3123/DEL/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Shishir Dhatwalia, Hamirpur vs Circle 1(1) Jalpaiguri, JalpaiguriITA 2583/KOL/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Raghava Gupta Valiveti, Bangalore vs Income Tax Officer Ward 5(3)(4), BangaloreITA 2744/BANG/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026