ACIT, CIRCLE 4(2), NEW DELHI vs. M/S CCIC INDIA PVT LTD, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) allowed the assessee's appeal on most additions without proper investigation, simply accepting the assessee's submissions. Therefore, the matter was remanded back to the CIT(A) for thorough investigation.
What were the facts?
The revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order deleting additions made by the AO. The CIT(A) had allowed the assessee's appeal based on unverified submissions without examining supporting documentary evidence.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in deleting additions without verifying documentary evidence and whether the assessee discharged its onus under Section 37(1) and Section 36(2) for the allowability of expenses and bad debts.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘B’ NEW DELHI
Before: MS. MADHUMITA ROY & SH. KRINWANT SAHAY
PER KRINWANT SAHAY AM Appeal in this case has been filed by the revenue against the order dated 17.10.2025 passed by the Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi for the A.Y. 2022-23. Grounds of appeal are as under :-
“1. Whether the Ld.CIT(A) has erred both on facts and in law in deleting the addition of Rs. 27,06,000/-made on account
2 ACIT Vs. M/s. CCIC India Pvt. Ltd. of disallowance of Provision for Audit Fee and Other Provisions, by allowing deduction solely on the basis of the assessee's unverified submissions, without calling for or examining any supporting documentary evidence such as Invoices, confirmations, or correspondence, to establish the existence of a legally enforceab
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 37(1)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Smit Navnitlal Soni, Ahmedabad, Gujarat vs ITO Ward-5(3)(1), Ahmedabad, GujaratITA 1434/AHD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shobha Sudamrao Tagad, Ahmednagar vs ITO WD-1, AhmednagarITA 311/PUN/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 839/IND/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2023-2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026