KESHAR DEI L/H LATE . PATI RAM,AGRA vs. I.T.O. WARD 1(2)(3) AGRA, AGRA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay, acknowledging the bona fide reasons provided by the assessee's legal heir. The matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication to ensure principles of natural justice are followed.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed ex-parte due to a delay of 699 days. The original assessee expired during the first appellate proceedings, and his illiterate legal heir faced difficulties in pursuing the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) order passed ex-parte without adequate opportunity of hearing is valid, and if the delay in filing the appeal can be condoned due to the death of the assessee and the legal heir's circumstances.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA (SMC
Before: SUNIL KUMAR SINGH & BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH
PER: BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH, A.M.
This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 24.04.2024 passed in appeal No CIT(APPEALS) 1, AGRA/10452/2019-20 by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax/ National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “CIT(A) u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) for the A.Y. 2012-13, wherein ld CIT(A) has dismissed assessee’s appeal ex-parte.
There is a delay of 699 days in filing this appeal before us. In this regard, the assessee has filed delay condonation application which is reproduced as under:
“1. That the accompanying appeal is being filed against the order dated 24/04/2024 passed by the Learned Commissioner of
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026