CHARANJIT SINGH BHASIN,NEW DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NEW DELHI
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal for AY 2017-18 arose from proceedings under section 144. The appellant claimed to be the legal representative of the deceased assessee, who had passed away before the assessment order was passed.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that there was no indication of the appellant managing or succeeding to the estate of the deceased, nor any proceedings initiated against them under section 159. Therefore, the appeal was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh proceedings.
What were the issues?
Whether the appellant, claiming to be the legal representative of a deceased assessee, was properly recognized and whether the assessment proceedings were validly initiated against them.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘H’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI
PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2017-18, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1081587924(1), dated 09.10.2025 involving proceedings under section 144 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
It transpires during the course of hearing that the appellant herein, namely, Sh. Tarunjot Singh Bhasin claims himself to be the legal representative of the deceased assessee Late Sh. Charanjit Singh who is stated to have expired on 15.05.2017 i.e. much before the assessment order passed on 12.12.2019
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 159
- Late Bhoodev Singh Through L/H Bimla Devi… vs ITO Ward 68(8), DelhiITA 8284/DEL/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Nandakumari Karlapudi, Guntur vs Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)…ITA 487/VIZ/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Jyoti Satish Naik As Wife and Legal Heir of… vs ITO, Ward 4(4), ThaneITA 2373/MUM/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2010-11
- Chandrikaben Ratilal Soni Lr Harshadbhai… vs Income Tax Officer Ward 5(2)(2), AhmedabadITA 1293/AHD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Rajender Singh (Through Legal Heir Deepak)… vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 1, SonipatITA 4293/DEL/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed1 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Nagarbhavi Club (R) vs. The State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 6 Oct 2026
- Newton Engineering And Chemicals Limited vs. Indian Oil Corporation LTD.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Life Insurance Corporation Of INDIA vs. N.S. Associates PVT. LTDDelhi · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Ideal Pharma, Through Its Proprietor Manish Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIA Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 6 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Surya Agro Fuels vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesMadras · 6 Oct 2026