ANIL SHAMRAOJI RAKHADE,MUMBAI vs. ITO, WARD 3(3), NAGPUR, NAGPUR
What were the facts?
Assessees received compensation under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme, 2019. They initially offered the amount to tax after claiming a partial exemption under section 10(10C) or paid tax on the excess over Rs. 5 lakhs. The claim for full exemption under section 10(10B) was made for the first time before the CIT(A).
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL VRS-2019 scheme constitutes retrenchment compensation and is eligible for exemption under section 10(10B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as a capital receipt not chargeable to tax without any limit. The CIT(A)'s findings were set aside.
What were the issues?
Whether compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme, 2019, qualifies as retrenchment compensation exempt under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act, and whether such a claim can be entertained for the first time before the appellate authorities.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NAGPUR “SMC” BENCH :: NAGPUR BEFORE SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI KHETTRA MOHAN ROY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Sr. ITA Nos. A.Y. Assessee Revenue No. 1-2 220/NAG/2026 2020-21 Yogesh Shyamsunder DCIT, 221/NAG/2026 2021-22 Maheshwari, Circle-3, C/o Padvekar Law Nagpur Chambers, 408, Maker Bhavan No.3, 21, New Marine Lines, Mumbai-20 PAN : ACOPM 3419 K 3 260/NAG/2026 2020-21 Ranjana Balkrisha ITO, Kadu, C/o Padvekar Ward-3, Law Chambers, 408, Amravati Maker Bhavan No.3, 21, New Marine Lines, Mumbai-20 PAN : ABPPK 0516 P 4-5 264/NAG/2026 2020-21 Makarand Damodar ITO, 265/NAG/2026 2021-22 Gadre, C/o Padvekar Ward-1, Law Chambers, 408, Akola Maker Bhavan No.3, 21, New Marine Lines, Mumbai-20 PAN : ABJPG 0081 H 6-7 266/NAG/2026 2020-21 Sharad Shivnarayan ITO, 267/NAG/2026 2021-22 Dubey, C/o Padvekar Ward-1, Law Chambers, 408, Chandrapur Maker Bhavan No.3, 21, New Marine Lines, Mumbai-20 PAN : AGIPD 1033 E
ITA No. 220 & 221/NAG/2026 & 38 other cases (Yogesh Shyamsunder Maheshwari & Ors.) 8-9 268/NAG/2026 2020-21 Malinee Bhaskar ITO, 269/NAG/2026 2021-22 Sawdadkar, Ward-3, C/o Padvekar Law Akola Chambers, 408, Maker Bhavan No.3, 21, New Marine Lin
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(10B)
- Kishorchandra Girdharlal Joshi, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 613/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shantilal Maganbhai Kalani, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 559/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shantilal Maganbhai Kalani, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 558/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Lakhman Shir, Jamnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), JamnagarITA 498/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Lakhman Shir, Jamnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), JamnagarITA 497/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Bibhasa Jena vs. The Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar CommissionerateOrissa · 9 Oct 2026
- M/S Otd Logistics Express Private Limited vs. The Commissioner CGST Cx And CustomsOrissa · 9 Oct 2026
- Sangram Mallik vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And CustomsOrissa · 9 Oct 2026
- Amitabh Samal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Cuttack 1Orissa · 9 Oct 2026
- Atul Kumar vs. The SuperintendentUttarakhand · 8 Oct 2026