THE GUARDIANS OF HUMANITY CHARITABLE TRUST,PANCHKULA, HARYANA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that while the assessee failed to provide sufficient verifiable evidence initially, the matter requires a more comprehensive examination. The CIT(E)'s order was set aside, and the case was restored for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust, applied for registration under section 12AB. The CIT(E) rejected the application as the trust's income and expenditure account did not reflect substantial charitable activities, and expenditures were allegedly incurred from personal funds of trustees without proper documentation.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of registration under section 12AB was justified solely based on the absence of documented charitable expenditure in the trust's books, when the assessee claimed activities were funded personally.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DIVISION BENCH, ‘B’ CHANDIGARH
Before: SHRI LALIET KUMAR & SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL
PER LALIET KUMAR, JM
Both the appeals have been filed by the assessee against the separate orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions)
Chandigarh [in short ‘the CIT (E)’] dated 28.02.2026 passed for assessment year 2027-28. Both the appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity.
ITA-1161 & 1163/CHD/2026 A.Y. 2027-28 2
The assessee, The Guardians of Humanity Charitable Trust,
filed an application in Form No. 10AB on 29.09.2025 seeking
registration under section 12AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961. During
the course of examination, the learned CIT (Exemptions) observed
that the Income & Expenditure Account of the Trust did not disclose
any substantial charitable activities. Accordingly, a show-cause
notice dated 09.02.2026 was issued calling upon the assessee to furnish documentary evidence such as activity reports, photographs,
newspaper clippings, bills, vouchers and other supporting material
to establish the genuineness of its charitable activities.
In response, the assessee explained that charitable activities
such as relief to the poor, Langar Seva and medical assistance had in fact been undertaken during the preceding years, but the expenditure was incurred directly by the trustees and members from their personal funds and voluntary contributions, without routing
the transactions through the Trust's bank account. It was also submitted that the Trust had no significant online presence and,
therefore, the absence of internet search results could not be construed against the genuineness of its activities.
ITA-1161 & 1163/CHD/2026 A.Y. 2027-28 3
The learned CIT (Exemptions), however, was not satisfied with the explanation. It was held that all voluntary contributions and expenditure relating to charitable activities ought to have been duly
recorded in the books of account and reflected in the financial
statements. Since the alleged activities were stated to have been carried out outside the accounting framework of the Trust and were unsupported by verifiable documentary evidence, bills, vouchers or beneficiary details, the genuineness of the activities could not be verified. Consequently, the application for registration under section 12AB was rejected vide order dated 28.02.2026. 5. The learned Authorised Representative submitted that the learned CIT (Exemptions) had erred in rejecting the application
merely because the charitable expenditure was not reflected in the Income & Expenditure Account of the Trust. It was contended that the Trust had actually carried out charitable activities including
distribution of food through Langar Seva, relief to poor persons and providing medical assistance to needy individuals. However, these
activities were financed directly by the trustees and members from their personal resources and voluntary contributions and, therefore,
ITA-1161 & 1163/CHD/2026 A.Y. 2027-28 4
It was further submitted that the absence of expenditure in the financial statements does not lead to the conclusion that no charitable activities were undertaken. The learned AR also argued
that the Trust operates at the grassroots level without maintaining
an official website or significant digital presence and, therefore, the absence of internet search results cannot be treated as evidence
against the genuineness of its charitable objects or activities.
According to the learned AR, the Trust had genuinely pursued its charitable objectives and was entitled to registration under section 12AB.
The learned Departmental Representative strongly relied upon the order passed by the learned CIT (Exemptions). It was submitted
that registration under section 12AB requires the competent
authority to satisfy itself regarding the genuineness of the activities
of the Trust. In the present case, the financial statements did not disclose any meaningful charitable expenditure or voluntary
contributions, and no verifiable documentary evidence such as bills,
vouchers, beneficiary records or audited financial entries had been ITA-1161 & 1163/CHD/2026 A.Y. 2027-28 5
produced to substantiate the alleged charitable activities.
The learned DR contended that charitable activities carried out
through personal funds of trustees, without routing the receipts and expenditure through the Trust's books of account, cannot be verified
under the statutory framework and, therefore, cannot form the basis
for recording satisfaction under section 12AB. It was accordingly
submitted that the learned CIT (Exemptions) had rightly rejected the application for registration after considering the material available
on record, and the order deserved to be upheld.
We have heard the rival submissions and carefully perused the material available on record. The issue before us relates to the rejection of the assessee's application seeking registration under section 12AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by the learned CIT
(Exemptions) on the ground that the assessee had failed to establish
the genuineness of its charitable activities through verifiable
documentary evidence and proper books of account.
From a perusal of the impugned order, we find that the learned
CIT (Exemptions) has primarily rejected the application on the ITA-1161 & 1163/CHD/2026 A.Y. 2027-28 6
premise that the charitable activities claimed to have been undertaken by the assessee were not reflected in its books of account
and the Income & Expenditure Statements, as the expenditure was allegedly incurred directly by the trustees from their personal funds.
The assessee has also claimed to have carried out various charitable
activities such as relief to the poor, Langar Seva and medical
assistance and has sought to explain the absence of accounting
entries on the ground that such expenditure was not routed through
the Trust's bank account.
In our considered opinion, the satisfaction regarding the genuineness of the activities under section 12AB is required to be arrived at after affording adequate opportunity to the applicant to substantiate its claim by producing all relevant material and supporting evidence. The impugned order indicates that though an opportunity was granted, the matter requires a more comprehensive
examination of the evidence which the assessee proposes to produce
in support of its charitable activities. Since the issue goes to the root
of the grant of registration under section 12AB, the interest of justice
would be better served if the matter is restored to the file of the ITA-1161 & 1163/CHD/2026 A.Y. 2027-28 7
learned CIT (Exemptions) for a fresh adjudication after granting
adequate and effective opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
At the same time, we also find that the assessee cannot be absolved of its responsibility of maintaining proper books of account
and producing complete documentary evidence before the statutory
authority at the first instance. The present remand has become
necessary largely because of the failure on the part of the assessee
to place complete and verifiable material before the learned CIT
(Exemptions). Such conduct has resulted in avoidable litigation and unnecessary consumption of judicial time.
Accordingly, while setting aside the impugned order, we restore
the matter to the file of the learned CIT (Exemptions) with a direction
to examine the application afresh in accordance with law after
considering all documentary evidence that may be produced by the assessee and after affording reasonable opportunity of being heard.
The assessee shall fully cooperate in the proceedings and shall produce complete books of account, supporting vouchers, evidence
of charitable activities and such other material as may be called for by the learned CIT (Exemptions).
ITA-1161 & 1163/CHD/2026 A.Y. 2027-28 8
However, the restoration of the matter shall be subject to the condition that the assessee deposits a sum of Rs.4000/- (Rupees Five
Thousand only) in each case, with the Poor Patient Welfare Fund,
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER),
Chandigarh, within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order.
Proof of such deposit shall be furnished before the learned CIT
(Exemptions) at the commencement of the remand proceedings.
Failure to comply with this direction shall entitle the learned CIT
(Exemptions) to proceed with the matter in accordance with law.
Accordingly, the impugned orders are set aside and the matter
is remanded to the file of the learned CIT (Exemptions) for fresh
adjudication in the light of the observations made hereinabove. The appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes, subject
to the payment of the aforesaid costs.
Order pronounced on 14.07.2026. (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER “Poonam”
ITA-1161 & 1163/CHD/2026 A.Y. 2027-28 9
आदेश की "ितिलिप अ"ेिषत/ Copy of the order forwarded to : अपीलाथ"/ The Appellant
""थ"/ The Respondent 2. आयकर आयु"/ CIT 3. िवभागीय "ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय आिधकरण, च"ीगढ़/ DR, ITAT,
CHANDIGARH गाड" फाईल/ Guard File 5.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Atiquiddin Shaikh vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Mr. Gurudev Singh vs. Kotak Mahindra BankMadhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026