INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1), GUNTUR vs. KONDA SRINIVASA REDDY, KUNCHANAPALLI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the revision order under Section 263 was already quashed by the ITAT, the subsequent reassessment and rectification orders based on it had no legal foundation and were correctly annulled by the CIT(A).
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) passed reassessment orders under Section 147 r.w.s. 263 and Section 154 r.w.s. 147. The Commissioner (Appeals) annulled these orders, relying on a previous ITAT order that had set aside the revision order under Section 263. The Revenue appealed this decision.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in annulling the reassessment and rectification orders when the Revenue's appeal against the ITAT order setting aside the revision order was pending before the High Court.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 144,Section 263,Section 144B,Section 154,Section 147
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, िवशाखाप"नम पीठ, िवशाखाप"नम INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH: DIVN BEFORE SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2016-17) INCOME TAX OFFICER, KONDA SRINIVASA REDDY WARD 2(1) H NO 3-130B, STANDARD HOUSE KUNCHANAPALLI, BUILDING, THIRD FLOOR, Vs. GUNTUR-522501, NAGARAMPALEM, ANDHRA PRADESH GUNTUR-522004, ANDHRA PRADESH अपीलाथ" Appellant ""थ" Respondent CO No.50 & 51/viz/2025 (In ITA 681 & 682/VIZ/2025) िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2016-17 KONDA SRINIVASA REDDY INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1) H NO 3-130B, STANDARD HOUSE KUNCHANAPALLI, BUILDING, THIRD FLOOR, GUNTUR-522501, Vs. NAGARAMPALEM, ANDHRA PRADESH GUNTUR-522004, ANDHRA PRADESH अपीलाथ" Appellant/Cross Objector ""थ" Respondent
Permanent Account Number of AAFHK9821E Assessee:
Assessee represented by: Shri C Subrahmanyam, CA Revenue represented by: Shri Nilanjan Dey, CIT(DR)
CO 50 & 51/VIZ/2025 सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of conclusion of hearing: 08-July-2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date of pronouncement: 15-July-2026 आदेश
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026